>>2001811

Who is the WE being referred to? WE THE PEOPLE, or WE as in Q team? Or both? Initially I thought WE as in anons. Then, I though WE (anons/THE PEOPLE), AND Q team.

Repost from late last bread:

4am talking points. If the method used to embed & spread was/is/will be taken over, it would force the issue. Imagine being MSNBC or CNN getting your talking points for the day, & they're FAR from the usual. Links to Q drops & anons' pages re: Q . Digs on the corrupt. Military involvement in an intel drop operation. The thought alone is hilarious to me

TL;Dr

Here's a definite WE anons' forcing the issue that WE haven't been talking about much:

#GoodbyeDemocrats

Let's force that one, since we can be sure of it

>>2001802 ← smells like liberal hatred to me…

>>2001997

>WHO HAS ALL OF THE INFORMATION?

>We have it all

Included would be any dirt on AMLO. Either clean up Mexico, or else…

>>2002037

>>2002040

What's your interpretation of what Q is telling us to ask?

>>2002043

>harassing journalists regarding Q is foolish

LOGICAL THINKING

Glad not to be the only adult in the room

Force

Fource

4am talking points, SecureDrop

How soon we forget when we don't re_read crumbs…

>>2002087

<maybe if i use lots of words, it'll look more convincing

>>2002126

>THEY KNOW WHAT IS COMING

& are doing their (not so) best to get ahead of it KEK

>>2002188

<let me use a presumption with no basis to see if he'll fall for it

>>2002166

It's fun, I'm not sure how productive it will be, as in actually getting results & getting questions asked publicly. This requires either a) a very direct approach such as infiltrating the 4am talking points (if that hasn't been done yet), or b) an event which MSM can't ignore. Journalists, etc, can easily ignore thousands of requests asking them to present specific questions. They do it every day & do what their bosses tell them to do. Again, Fun to do, & makes those who don't know wonder why they keep seeing this question on twitter or wherever (affects the masses positively in that way) but effective? If someone with wide exposure goes against the grain, of their OWN FREE WILL, then, maybe. Social media bombardment though , may or may not get it done. Try it though & have fun, I wouldn't tell anyone not to.

>>2002233

How so? When the choice is always yours?

>>2002203

yeah, lots of liberal hatred is gay

>>2002311

National Suicide Prevention Lifeline

1-800-273-TALK (8255)

If you're serious, you should know that this is not the place to find help. Try the above instead, in all seriousness, if you are sincere.

Don't blame anyone else though, for your choices.

>>2002321

Sounds like you should take your own advice, padre, you should have been doing the laughing along with me

don't be so touchy, it's embarrasses us >>2002321

>>2001859

Don't be paranoid, & don't be lazy.

>>2002402

Liberal hatred, and now liberal lies…on a roll

>>2002452