>>20026104

>You don't know anything about anons. Faceless, nameless, all that stuff. You are simply on display, an example of shill agenda that fails here.

Are you here for Trump and Q? Then it should bother you that an election was stolen from him and should welcome a solution. But you cry about the solution and the solution provider. Trump, Flynn, Mike Lindell, and many others are not anonymous, why doesn't that bother you too? Clown.

>>20026120

>Why reinvent the wheel?

>Didn’t have to as it was already done by others but stick to that cool story

You are naive. A voting machine is server side technology. One compromised machine equals millions of tampered with votes. My software if ever tampered with would result in 1 vote. Reread idiot.