Anonymous ID: 177f24 Dec. 9, 2023, 2:54 a.m. No.20047871   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7874 >>7876 >>7878

>>20047866

If the minorities want to be the majority then why can't they do that in the countries they came from?

But which minority gets to be the majority? Sounds like the makings of a civil war.

If whites become the minority then we will get to see the blacks duke it out with the browns.

Once the blacks and the browns kill each other off then the whites get to be the majority again.

Kek.

Anonymous ID: 177f24 Dec. 9, 2023, 6:43 a.m. No.20048271   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8279 >>8292

>>20048210

Interesting (and infuriating). I'm starting to think that the future is apps running in the web browser which can't be locked down without locking down the Internet. The only problem is bypassing the built-in web restrictions (known loosely as cross-origin resource sharing or CORS). This can be done with a local proxy server which is something that I've been working on. Simple example is the J6 download app which bypasses the login restrictions on the government site to download the videos. The sky is the limit for more sophisticated apps. Browsers have become quite powerful and may be considered as a platform-independent operating system. The possibilities have yet to be fully explored.

Anonymous ID: 177f24 Dec. 9, 2023, 6:54 a.m. No.20048310   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8323

>>20048292

>can't switch that shit off

Can be bypassed. I'm not talking about working within the limits of the browser but bypassing the limits. For normal web browsing, the limits work to protect the user from malicious software. For personal productivity apps, the limits work against getting real work done.

>browsers are garbage and also a moving target.

Not so. Browsers are becoming more cross-compatible. Developers just have to stay away from the new-fangled shit (which is mostly not needed).

Anonymous ID: 177f24 Dec. 9, 2023, 7:13 a.m. No.20048380   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8398

>>20048364

>but I'm against hacks.

I hear you but that's not the real world. We have to fight them not plead with them to think about the user first.

I've long ago determined that the way forward is to work around the powers-that-be with whatever tools I can concoct for the purpose. Information wants to be free even if it means breaking some eggs.

Anonymous ID: 177f24 Dec. 9, 2023, 7:23 a.m. No.20048410   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8426

>>20048398

>In the business world, that I earn my living from, there are no fucking hacks, especially not shit like this.

Kek.

>using their CPUs (with microcode) and GPUs, their internet and their firmware?

You're right, of course. The only solution is to escape to the woods.

 

Instead of getting depressed about it, consider what you can do. Even if it takes some dirty tricks. Who's to know? Your pinhead manager?

Anonymous ID: 177f24 Dec. 9, 2023, 7:35 a.m. No.20048458   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8480 >>8536

>>20048426

>Our shit doesn't break, because we don't do hacks, simple as that.

There are "hacks" and there are "hacks". What do you mean by that? I'm not talking about writing shitty code that breaks, obviously.

>I'm simply not idiotic pushing everything onto the internet

Is that what we're talking about? The browser does not equate to the internet. It uses the internet but you can certainly run it without an internet connection. You're just throwing up a strawman for me to whack at.

Anonymous ID: 177f24 Dec. 9, 2023, 7:53 a.m. No.20048524   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8547

>>20048480

>And they have to change shit all the time, and add new shit and break shit.

That is all beside the point that I'm trying to make. Everybody breaks their own shit. It isn't unique to web browsers. I've had to update my own code several times because shit got changed in Node but there's no point crying about it. I fix it and move on.

>"sorry, this web app requires X"

>"sorry, this web app isn't support anymore"

You work with the lowest common denominator. You know that, for fuck sake. Stop throwing up more strawmen. Why would you rely on arcane features that might become deprecated? I use about 10% of what Javascript can do and I'm happy with that. I don't go looking for features that might not work later. I use what I need and nothing more. I don't use third-party code except where it is absolutely necessary. I've seen too many developers drag packages into their apps for no reason other than that they're too incompetent or inexperienced to solve the problem independently.

 

Your negativity is coming from the wrong place, fren.

Anonymous ID: 177f24 Dec. 9, 2023, 8:06 a.m. No.20048551   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>20048536

>must violate web standard to protect users by not transmitting cookies in certain situations

Kek. The third-party cookie problem. Server controls that with a cookie setting (same-site=none or whatever). Do you control the server? Anyway, what my J6 download app does is steal the fucking cookie which can then be used with impunity via the proxy server. Is that too much of a "hack" for your taste? If you have to do itโ€ฆ

>HTTPS by itself is full on garbage anyway

Totally agree.

 

End of bread cometh. Next bread?