>>20063147

this blasphemer is spamming?

what is the purpose of this idiot's spam?

the text is too small to read.

the breads are flooded by bots and shills pretending to antiquarian knowledge (ancient mysteries) and also to 'inside baseball' international diplomacy. But what we have is a persona of the brag boaster time waster who is vain and creepy and megalomanical.

in a flood which results in

detritus of mind spewn about in the bread, like the waste that shows up all around after the flood waters retreat, we have a debris field of false ideas in the way, and which seems calculated to waste people's time.

and if you point it out they attack you.

>>20063195

>>20063209

why is this a red text thing with you?

rich countries help poor people.

is it because the money was looted by Hamas?

is it because it was spent for military projects and not for the civic betterment of a place that could have been an awesome tourist destination?

how is it scandalous when rich countries help poor countries?

please explain why this kind of welfare is red-text material?

>>20063207

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/pale

to pale (pale as a verb)

when something fades into a whiter shade?

>>20063235

ah, either you tagged the wrong post or you are gaslighting.

sorry, your post is meaningless to me, it seems like an attack.

I want an explanation about why it's bad for one rich country to pay for the well being of another country that is poor.

or is the idea that you think (or whoever is posting the red text thinks) that Qatar and Israel are using Gaza as a distraction so that the cabal stays in power, to launder money?

your post seems like an attack on me for daring to ask for clarity.

please explain your self (or not).

>>20063269

Very many people have speculated about Atlantis. No one has found it.

some say 'oh, it must be this civilization' and others 'oh it must be that civilization' others 'it's just a myth'.

anon, curious as anon are, most likely read a lot of various accounts.

I had my 'lost cities' phase of research 25 or more years ago and love the stories about lost cities. I've had a 'real archology' phase more recently.

and so when someone, like that other poster, goes into his 'oh Atlantis' bit, with less than 45 word (or even less) I just say 'who is fooled by this?'

and as far as 'where is it' or 'has it been found', I would think that an intelligent seeker after historical truth would do their research off line and then get to the place where they understand (as you seem to) that the answer can not be stated as being conclusive. There is no consensus amoung those who study ancient history, nor have any ruins been found that seem to fit, exactly, the very scant and thin accounts that come from antiquity.

I do think that there was an an Atlantis, but when it was and where?

I tend to lean 'near Cadiz, in the Hyberian penninsula' but I'm just going on thin evidence.

another theory is a dome-mountains formation in the deserts of North West Africa. I doubt in the Americas because that's too far away.

as far as 'is it 400,000 years ago'? that number is a fantasy anything that old would be astounding and nothing like that, no human city, that old, has ever been discovered or alleged by anyone in the Archeological community.

conclusion: shills use antiquarian speculations as a distraction. Intelligent anons either filter or comment, as you did, that it's a distraction.

Atlantis is an interesting topic, and a blue-pill study (meaning it's a pleasant distraction) if you have some time.

is it a serious topic for here?

I'd say no unless some major new find occurs.

>>20063317

that is the dome mountain structure to which I referred.

I read about that and I concluded that it is most likely a natural structure of granite, and not Atlantis.

It's much much larger than Atlantis as described by Plato.

>>20063333

The 'Lost Cities' series of books by David Hatcher Childress is a fun look into that whole topic of lost civilizations.

What Childress does is document the stories and go out and look for ruins (must have had a trust fund) and writes about his travels, speculating about the various stories, and cataloging them, never saying if or if not any of it is true, but giving opinions that some seems fantastical.

as far as 'sea level' changes: here is a curious bit of information: the Champlain Valley seems to have gotten higher and the Georges bank seems to ahve gotten lower which would be explained not by a single change in sea level but by a pivot of the plate on which they both sit. The Western part went higher, the eastern part went lower. So it's wasn't a rise or fall in sea level (though that might have also happened) but a plate pivoting.

pretty wild. maybe the weight of glaciers made one side lower and when they melted it went up higher?

https://davidhatcherchildress.com/books

>>20063400

what I don't understand, anon, about your 'theory' is that if Qatar and Israel plot together and use Hamas a patsy's, as you imply, and the palestinians as cannon foder, then they basically control the Middle East and so then why would they keep up the constant warfare?

if they are the same people why not just have peace and build that new canal and make a tourist paradise?

why would they keep up the war and destruction?

for what purpose?

>>20063426

misinformation and FUD doesn't exist as truth.

misinformation and FUD is a lie that flows through shills.

>>20063426

misinformation and FUD doesn't exist as truth.

misinformation and FUD is a lie that flows through shills.

>>20063437

OK, so you have a very dark view of them.

So then why don't the locals get wind of this and revolt?

why don't the common Jews and the common Muslims come to understand it the way you see it and cast off their oppressive regimes and initiate a reign of peace, as has been desired since antiquity?

>>20063454

He catalogs all the various BS, anon.

It's very useful to read it to get an idea of what one is up against when faced with those who don't do their own research and just follow along with a false narrative.

He's fairly clear that he's giving you stories and fables.

as I said a 'fun blue pill'.

don't you find it amusing to read the myths that others hang onto?

that way you can understand where they are coming from and debunk their nonsense a lot easier: you already know where they are going.

if you don't listen to the bunk you will have no easy way to debunk it when you encounter it in the wild.

fun read, he really does go to real sites and really does his own travelling.

fun, at best, as a travel log.

I agree: take it all as a story and a fable and a review of the myths of others.

somewhere in it all there are hints at real things, catalogs of real lost cities, and at least catalogs of stories that were always myths, or were they?

>>20063475

this person gives an extreame point of view to try and start a fight, suggesting genocide for palestine.

guess what: much of Israel is NOT OWNED by jews so fat chance for your fable. Also most Jews wouldn't want what you suggest.

>>20063493

you are changing the subject.

your degenerate idea of 'camps in Siani' is attrocious, and you only posted it to be provokative. I point out one reason why our ridiculous idea is never going to happen, and you try to change the subject.

shill fail

>>20063489

The 'giants of Sardinia' narrative is fairly interesting.

>>20063686

that kind of wrath is very real but

asking for it for others is always a big mistake.

careful what you ask for others to have happen to them, cause that's what others will have happen to you.