>>20063948 (lb)
>>https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12850721/us-candy-cancer-chemicals-seized-uk.html
Is 'mujoo' same as 'muhjoo'? neither make sense to me.
are you saying 'my jew' with a slack jawed accent?
if so why and wtf does it mean? BTW I am not 'your jew'. But Jesus can be.
Watchdog calls on US to ban candy cancer chemicals as UK begins SEIZING Mountain Dew, Jolly Rancher, Swedish Fish and Lemonhead amid crackdown on American junk food that is linked to infertility and health issues
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12850721/us-candy-cancer-chemicals-seized-uk.html
A US watchdog has told DailyMail.com that the seizure of American candies in the UK should be a wake-up call for Americans about what's in their food.
On Monday, footage from the UK showed workers stuffing American candy and sodas - which are found in virtually every US store — into trash bags as regulators get tough on US imports.
Candies like Jolly Rancher, Swedish Fish and Lemonhead contain several additives that are legal in the US but banned under EU and UK law due to their links to cancer, infertility and other problems.
The watchdog Consumer Reports said the video should trigger a shift in food policy in the US and urged officials here to 'do more' to protect adults and children.
They called for the list of food additives banned in the US to be expanded — to include more food dyes and chemicals outlawed in Europe years ago.
Consumer Reports said this should be a turning point for the US, and urged officials to look to ban more food dyes and additives that were outlawed in Europe years ago
Trading standard officers seized thousands of popular US candies and sodas. Pictured above are Mountain Dew, Twizzlers, Jolly Ranchers, Sunny D and Swedish Fish that were seized by officials
The Food and Drugs Administration has been under increasing pressure to tighten its regulations on food additives in recent months.
California outlawed four food additives — brominated vegetable oil, potassium bromate, propyl paraben, and red dye no.3 — in October amid concerns over their links to cancer and other health problems.
New York and Pennsylvania are now also looking to follow suit, DailyMail.com exclusively revealed.
Brian Ronholm, director of food policy at Consumer Reports, said: 'The chemical additives that are to be banned under the California law are certainly a good start for addressing this issue in the US.
'However, as this import action in the UK highlights, more needs to be done.
'The list of chemical additives to target and scrutinize should be expanded to include synthetic food dyes and other chemicals that have been linked to cancer and other adverse health conditions.'
He added: 'What is ultimately needed in the US is for the FDA to modernize and strengthen its regulatory process for food additives.'
p1
The UK and European Union outlawed many of these additives decades ago.
Representatives in California say that everyone in America deserves to be 'as well protected' as people in Europe.
Dr Carolyn Williams, a dietician based in Alabama, told DailyMail.com that she hoped the images would 'motivate' US regulators to take action.
'We should be moving the way that Europe is moving, the way that California is moving,' she said. 'That would be a great first step for the country.'
'We are way overdue in the US to adopt some of the EU's food policies.'
The mother-of-two added: 'I wish [additive bans] would trick over into the US.
'I saw very early in one of my children the effects of food additives.
'There is a blue dye, a blue coloring, and I noticed when he ate this particular blue dye — it is in some cakes and in some candy — his hyperactivity went through the roof.'
In the UK, at least nine popular US products are now being seized by officials because of the ingredients they contain.
Among them are Twizzlers and Lemonhead, which contain mineral oil — a substance derived from petroleum that studies suggest raise the risk of cancer.
Dubble Bubble is being removed because it contains BHT, or butylated hydroxytoluene, which studies show can promote tumor growth and impair blood clotting.
UK officials were also cracking down on Mountain Dew because it contains calcium disodium EDTA, which is linked to cancer.
And Sunny D and Mirinda were seized because they contain potassium sorbate, a food preservative that raises the risk of allergic reaction.
Mineral oil, BHT, calcium disodium and potassium sorbate are all banned from food products in the UK because of the health risks.
UK officials were also seizing Swedish Fish, Jolly Rancher and Hot Tamales because they contain color additives, including Red 40, yellow 5, yellow 6 and blue 1, which are linked to hyperactivity in children like attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as well as problems with the immune system.
John Herriman, the chief executive of the UK's Chartered Trading Standards Institute behind the seizures, said: 'The UK prides itself on high food standards but this very much relies on Trading Standards ensuring that what is on sale complies with the law.
'It is, therefore, extremely worrying to learn that as we approach Christmas, confectionary that we know will appeal to children is on sale in UK high streets, and that it could be linked to hyperactivity in kids and even cancer.'
Victoria Wilson, the cabinet member for trading standards in an area of the UK, said: 'It's quite worrying to see so many products on sale that shouldn't be, many of which contain unauthorized ingredients and are targeted at children.'
The products were seized from 22 shops across Staffordshire, an area in the Midlands of the UK just above Birmingham.
The products were all manufactured for sale in the US market but were later imported into the UK.
Manufacturers said their products were legally produced in the US and that any products being sold in the UK were being done so illegally and not associated with their brands.
American candy shops are becoming more commonplace in the UK thanks to social media channels advertising the foods.
Nearly $11,000 (GBP 8,500) worth of the products were seized from tens of shops across the country.
2 of 2
not new. been asking this periodically for years. no one ever answers clearly, and it seems some anons have a real issue with it, and anon wants to understand why and how it relates to Q.
muh means my, no?
Not new, just don't understand why this is everpresent here, and it appears to have no clear meaning.
Definition states it means my, but it does not appear used that way here. Are anons saying 'my jews', ie, their people, because if so it is very unclear.
What is the purpose of sounding dumb?
>Vigano Mentions Pizzagate, Names Names
Why did he wait so many years to do so?
Controlled OP IMHO.
pizzagate or controlled OPs are funny?
you are welcome for the medicine, as laughter is best kind, though in this case it was not intended.
still not defining clearly the phrase.
support or against?
Like is I say 'my man' or 'my nigga' or 'my homies' or 'my peeps', obviously I am down with whatever is following the 'my'. But with 'my jews' written as 'muhjoos'? unclear and slackjaw sounding.
Alex Jones
@RealAlexJones
Italian Health Minister Gave Orders To Conceal Vaccination Deaths – Now Under Investigation For Murder.
0:03 / 5:58
11:35 AM · Dec 12, 2023
·
https://twitter.com/RealAlexJones/status/1734628095942898142
Former CIA Station Chief of Alec Station puts Bill Maher in his place on American support for Israel
Michael Scheuer Vs. Bill Maher's on Israel
3 min
and wtf does antisemitic mean exactly? It seems to me that that word is used when a uncomfortable truth is revealed, otherwise shouldn't a false revelation or accusation be called a lie, slander, libel, etc?
Is it antisemitic to not want to be lied to, owned as an asset of a corporation, victimized by usury, to exist under the yoke of BIS/FED debt slavery, and held hostage by those who enable and extort our politicians using their degenerate proclivities and skeleton packed closets? If so, that is not a bad or negative thing, so who GAF?
What is wrong with being called or being antisemitic if the word merely means one who reveals truth? Obviously the word does not mean LIAR, so…
this is evidenced here, in MSM, and IRL global politricks and has been in all of anons 50 years.
It is cool being alive at a time when most of the world is waking up to it and saying no mas though. No more sympathy, no more money, no more lies, etc…
Basically, from where anon sits, the world is sick of being lied to. And whomever the source, they will be exposed, to the best of our and those seeking and sharing's abilities. And not just jews, vatican, goverments, intel orgs, etc…
Has the greatness been clearly defined and identified re:MAGA? As from here, America has been a spellbound nation since inception, where the populace is lied to fleeced, taxed, experimented upon, exterminated, dumbed down and sickened in Rockefeller educational systems and medicine, fed degeneracy and violence in media, and been programed to support war and conquest. It doesn't seem to me that any nation is 'great', free, or in possession of unobstructed truth or history. Thus Make America Great Again, like the War on Drugs, or War on Crime, or War on Terror, etc seems like marketing speak for a non-existent target or an abstract idea that would necessarily be different for all.
https://twitter.com/MAVERIC68078049/status/1734278104431165728
MAVERICK X
@MAVERIC68078049
Angelina Jolie, a Hollywood actress, joined the campaign and is now promoting eating bugs and insects instead of meat.
Considering that there are fewer and fewer birds due to 5G blasting, they want you to compensate for the broken food chain and eat those bugs. The World Economic Forum says, eat insects, it's healthy, and you're saving the planet.
12:24 PM · Dec 11, 2023
·
https://twitter.com/MAVERIC68078049/status/1734278104431165728
Inhabitants of the community of Texcapilla, municipality of Texcaltitlán, in the south of the State of Mexico, grew tired of the extortions of the Familia Michoacana and decided to confront the criminals, who responded with gunshots.
https://twitter.com/beltrandelrio/status/1733262175781749061
Hedge Funds Are Challenging SEC’s New Short-Sale Disclosure Requirements
Trade groups say they sued in federal court to invalidate them
Legal pushback is latest from industry on SEC regulations
By Lydia Beyoud
December 12, 2023 at 8:02 PM UTC
Save
Hedge funds are challenging new Securities and Exchange Commission requirements that would force investors to reveal far more about short selling and related stock lending — the latest industry pushback on a spate of new rules by Wall Street’s main regulator.
The Managed Funds Association, the Alternative Investment Management Association and the National Association of Private Fund Managers said Tuesday that they had asked a federal appeals court in New Orleans to invalidate the regulations, which the SEC approved in October. The groups claimed in a statement that the agency didn’t adequately calculate the combined financial impact of the rules and that they “would apply contradictory and incoherent approaches to two aspects of the same underlying transaction.”
“In particular, the SEC protects the value of anonymity for short sellers in one rule — where it acknowledges short sellers’ contributions to liquidity and price efficiency — but then in the other rule exposes short sellers’ confidential securities lending and position information on a granular basis,” they said.
The SEC responded in a statement that it “undertakes rulemaking consistent with its authorities and laws governing the administrative process, and we will vigorously defend challenged rules in court.”
Read more: Hedge Funds Get New SEC Mandate for Reporting Short Sales
Short selling has grown more controversial in recent years, despite being a fixture of the US equity market. The practice drew greater scrutiny after retail traders banded together on social media platforms in January 2021 to buy up shares of companies like GameStop Corp. Among their goals was to raise the costs for hedge funds to maintain their short positions by keeping the stock prices elevated.
The SEC’s new rules for short sellers require private funds to report their transactions on a monthly basis. Pension funds, banks and institutional money managers that lend their stocks would have to report the transactions the next day. Gary Gensler, the agency’s chair, said when the agency approved the rules on Oct. 13 that they were necessary to bring more transparency to the $3 trillion securities lending market, where information asymmetry can disadvantage some traders.
— With assistance from Madlin Mekelbur
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-12-12/hedge-funds-are-challenging-sec-s-new-short-sale-disclosure-requirements
bad to worse
https://www.usdebtclock.org
what do these questions have to do with 'faery tales'?