>>2006099

this is exactly the problem i'm talking about.

here's what i'm talking about. go look this up, what do i mean, here's a full description, here's q, who's q, let me explain...

i want something simpler. no explanations. timeline, outline. not offering proof. just the story.

this is great - only because i already know it.

i'll work something up, and post it in a future bread.

>>2006070

it's not the proofs.

proofs aren't a good start, that's after the hook.

we need a lead in.

more of a narrative-sales-pitch.

still thinking - will return.