Anonymous ID: ab05da Dec. 12, 2023, 10:23 p.m. No.20066591   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6596

>>20066583

 

MAGA Patriots/MAGA Riots/MAGA Extractions/MAGA Civil War/MAGA Ex-Military/MAGA Mercenary/MAGA Code Red/MAGA Black Ops/MAGA Cyber/MAGA Point Blank/MAGA BlackOut Ops/MAGA Patriots 100% Cowboy/MAGA Cyber/MAGA Internet Key/MAGA Patriots Matrix Algebra/MAGA Patriots USA COMMAND CENTER/MAGA Cyber Warfare/MAGA AI Algorithms/ MAGA PATRIOTS CONSTITUTIONAL Americans/ MAGA AI Code Writers/MAGA Command Center/MAGA Cyber Technology/MAGA Patriots High Value Extraction/MAGA Super AI/MAGA Patriot Mercenary/MAGA AI mother code/MAGA WARZONE/MAGA Patriots Private Contractors/MAGA Skunkworks/MAGA First Responder Angels/MAGA Crusaders

 

Maga Patriots, the Patriot Front of 8Kun

Anonymous ID: ab05da Dec. 13, 2023, 12:05 a.m. No.20066773   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6817 >>6899 >>7022 >>7492

Proposed COP28 Climate Deal Calls for Transition Away from Fossil Fuels

By Valerie Volcovici, Gloria Dickie and William James Reuters December 12, 2023

 

DUBAI, Dec 13 (Reuters) – The COP28 Presidency released a proposed text of a final climate deal on Wednesday that would, for the first time, push nations to transition away from fossil fuels to avert the worst effects of climate change.

 

The draft is meant to reflect the consensus view of nearly 200 countries gathered at the conference in Dubai, where scores of governments have insisted on strong language to signal an eventual end to the fossil fuel era – over protests from members of the oil producer group OPEC and its allies.

 

“It is the first time that the world unites around such a clear text on the need to transition away from fossil fuels. It has been the elephant in the room. At last we address it head on,” said Norway’s Minister for Climate and the Environment, Espen Barth Eide.

 

Country representatives have been called to what the COP28 Presidency hopes is a final meeting on Wednesday morning, where they could pass the deal and end two weeks of tough negotiations that have run a day into overtime.

 

Deals struck at U.N. climate summits must be passed by consensus, at which point individual countries are responsible for delivering on the agreements through national policies and investments.

 

The proposed deal would specifically call for “transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems, in a just, orderly and equitable manner … so as to achieve net zero by 2050 in keeping with the science.”

 

It also calls for a tripling of renewable energy capacity globally by 2030, speeding up efforts to reduce coal, and accelerating technologies such as carbon capture and storage that can clean up hard-to-decarbonize industries.

 

If adopted, it would mark the first time in three decades of COP climate summits that nations have agreed on a concerted move away from oil, gas and coal, which account for 80% of global energy. Scientists say fossil fuels are by far the largest source of the greenhouse gas emissions driving climate change.

 

“The latest Global Stocktake text sends a strong signal that world leaders recognize that a sharp turn away from fossil fuels … is essential to meet our climate goals,” said Rachel Cleetus, policy director at the Union of Concerned Scientists.

 

She noted, however, that the proposal does not commit rich countries to offer more financing to help developing countries transition away from fossil fuels.

 

“The finance and equity provisions… are seriously insufficient and must be improved in the time ahead in order to ensure low- and middle-income countries can transition to clean energy and close the energy poverty gap,” she said.

OPEC OPPOSITION

 

It was not immediately clear whether the proposed deal would win enough support to be adopted.

 

Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) Secretary General Haitham Al Ghais said in a letter dated Dec. 6 to OPEC members and allies at COP28 that the world should target emissions rather than fossil fuels themselves, rallying them to oppose any deal targeting oil.

 

OPEC countries together control nearly 80% of the world’s proven oil reserves along with about a third of globaloil production, and their governments rely heavily on the revenues.

 

Oil producers have argued that fossil fuels can be cleansed of their climate impact by using technology that can capture and store carbon dioxide emissions. Carbon capture, however, is expensive and has yet to be proven at scale.

 

Negotiators and observers in the COP28 talks told Reuters that although Saudi Arabia has been the strongest opponent of anti-fossil fuel language in the text, other OPEC and OPEC+ members, including Iran, Iraq and Russia, have also resisted.

 

https://gcaptain.com/proposed-cop28-climate-deal-calls-for-transition-away-from-fossil-fuels/

Anonymous ID: ab05da Dec. 13, 2023, 12:09 a.m. No.20066782   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6799 >>6817 >>6899 >>7022 >>7492

I get the feeling boatfagging is about to get harder

 

Israeli Port Disclosed the Destination of Tanker Hit by Houthi Missile

Published Dec 12, 2023 1:33 PM by The Maritime Executive

 

 

After Yemen's Houthi rebel faction said that it would attack any ship headed to Israel, a major Israeli seaport kept a full list of all arriving ships on its public website, available for the public to view. The list included the Norwegian-flagged vessel Strinda; there is only one IMO-registered vessel by that name, and it was struck by a Houthi antiship missile on Monday evening.

 

The port's traffic list was still available in cached form using Google Cache on Tuesday afternoon, and it gave Strinda's scheduled arrival date as the morning of January 4. Dozens of other vessels' names and future arrival dates were also listed.

 

Iran-backed Houthi fighters confirmed their responsibility for the attack on Tuesday, and a spokesman said that the group launched the missile after the crew of the Strinda "rejected all warning calls." He said that like the Israeli seaport, the group also had the impression that the Strinda was bound for Israel, and carrying a cargo of oil.

 

On Tuesday, the shipowner told BBC that this understanding was incorrect. The Strinda's previous port of call was in Malaysia, and the owner said that the ship had picked up a cargo of palm oil for delivery to Italy.

 

The vessel is reported to be safe and the crew unharmed. Its AIS signal has disappeared from commercial tracking, but showed that the vessel continued to navigate northwards after the attack.

 

Over the past five years, not one attack by an Iranian proxy or Iranian military force has resulted in the total loss of a merchant ship, though damage and (in a minority of cases) tragic harm to personnel have occurred. Iranian-controlled forces have used hand-placed mines, aerial drones and antiship missiles against tankers, car carriers and boxships, creating individual holes but not catastrophic damage.

 

By contrast, the 2016 Houthi missile strike on the ex-U.S. Navy transport Swift - an aluminum-hulled fast ferry - shredded and burnt the vessel beyond recovery. (The U.S. Navy has discontinued aluminum-hull procurement in future orders).

 

https://maritime-executive.com/article/israeli-seaport-disclosed-voyage-of-tanker-hit-by-anti-israeli-attack

Anonymous ID: ab05da Dec. 13, 2023, 12:17 a.m. No.20066793   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20066659

 

Third on Notable

 

'''Man caught spiking his female dates drinks with Viagra to make sure they don't get boners because "You never know anymore these days"

Anonymous ID: ab05da Dec. 13, 2023, 12:59 a.m. No.20066842   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7022 >>7492

Australia #33 >>20066837

 

Congress gives US the ammunition to torpedo AUKUS deal

BEN PACKHAM - DECEMBER 13, 2023

 

A future US president will have to certify that the transfer of nuclear submarines to Australia will not undermine America’s military capabilities or foreign policy, under draft legislation that offers multiple get-out clauses for any ­coming administrations to scupper the AUKUS agreement.

 

The legislation agreed by congress’ Senate and House armed services committees – which is due to pass in coming days – would make the sale of three Virginia-class submarines to Australia contingent on guarantees provided by the president “not later than 290 days” before the transfer.

 

The provision would require the president of the day to certify that the transfer of the submarines “will not degrade the United States undersea capabilities” and is “consistent with US foreign policy and national security interests”. The sale would also be conditional on the US “making sufficient submarine production and maintenance investments” to meet its own needs, and on Australia having the capability to operate the vessels.

 

The wording comes despite the Albanese government’s assurances that Australia would have sovereign control over the US-supplied boats, and fears among AUKUS critics that the deal could draw the nation into a future US war with China over Taiwan.

 

Under the terms of the AUKUS pact, Australia is due to receive the first of three to five AUKUS submarines from 2032. But there have been bipartisan concerns in the US that the country’s submarine manufacturing capability is lagging well behind where it would need to be to supply any nuclear-powered boats to Australia.

 

Greens senator David Shoebridge said the US bill’s language threw fresh doubt on the AUKUS program and the Albanese government’s claims the boats would be under Australia’s full control.

 

“Put simply, the US will only provide scarce Virginia-class submarines to Australia if Australia promises to use them whenever and however the US military demands,” Senator Shoebridge said.

 

“Essentially, to satisfy these requirements, the Australian government will be required to give the United States a blank cheque to follow it into whatever war it chooses with China.

 

“This is an incredibly reckless bargain for any Australian leader to agree to.”

 

Strategic Analysis Australia research director Marcus Hellyer said the US National Defence Authorisation Act would authorise a future president to transfer the submarines, “but it doesn’t compel them to”.

 

“It’s possible a future president may consider a transfer is not in the US’s interest,” Dr Hellyer said.

 

“The president also has to certify the transfer will not degrade the US’s undersea capabilities. That could be difficult.”

 

He said on the current US submarine-building schedule, there did not appear to be any capacity to have any additional submarines in service by the time the first Virginia-class boat was due to be transferred to Australia. “That means any boat transferred to Australia will result in a reduction in the US Navy’s submarine numbers,” Dr Hellyer said.

 

“The bottom line is we are still nearly a decade away from the transfer of the first boat, and that’s a long time in politics.”

 

Defence Minister Richard Marles, who recently returned from AUKUS meetings in California, argued the US had a lot to gain from the submarine partnership.

 

“What is clear is the value of the relationship between America and Australia, and specifically the importance of the arrangement with AUKUS and the strategic value to the United States of Australia acquiring a nuclear-powered submarine capability,” he said.

 

“We are hopeful and completely respectful of the processes that are playing out in the congress.

 

“Ultimately, it is a matter for the congress but we are very hopeful about how that is tracking.”

 

Democrats and Republicans agreed to the terms of the submarine transfer last week, backing changes to remove legal impediments that would have thwarted the AUKUS deal.

 

“For the first time since the launch of the USS Nautilus in 1958, this National Defence Authorisation Act authorises the US Navy to sell three conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines to another nation – our steadfast ally Australia,” Democrat congressman Joe Courtney said.

 

US submarine forces commander Vice Admiral William Houston said last month the US navy envisaged the transfer of two Virginia-class submarines from the existing US inventory from 2032, and a third directly from the production line.

 

A Congressional Budget ­Office report last month warned the boats would not be guaranteed to support the US in any conflict, noting Australia’s refusal to pledge to join the US in a war with China on Taiwan.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/congress-gives-us-the-ammunition-to-torpedo-aukus-deal/news-story/b180aa551b8bd1ac321dab1e5220a80f

Anonymous ID: ab05da Dec. 13, 2023, 4:22 a.m. No.20067276   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7296 >>7400

I'm usually around at night so is this a normal Wednesday or did the Russians take Kiev? I can understand fully caffeinated shills, even bots with fresh batteries