>>20069958

>So, how many souls did it cost to adjust the Algorythm to put "Trump" into office?

Ask yourself an honest question, why would a billionaire who has it all, fame, fortune, a warm and loving family, friends, etc. want to endanger himself and his family by becoming POTUS?

Why would he want to target himself and those he cares about?

Does he need money?

Does he need fame?

What does he get out of this?

Does he want to make the US/world a better place for his family and for those good and decent people who have long been taken advantage of?

Perhaps he could not stomach the thought of mass murders occurring to satisfy Moloch?

Perhaps he could not stomach the thought of children being kidnapped, drugged, and raped while leaders/law enforcement of the world turn a blind eye.

Q

153

>>20070075

>>20069984

>Nobody cares

Argument negated by demonstration.

Gopher?

>>20070138

>Why should he be any different?

Perhaps he was tired of seeing how certain races/countries were being constantly abused and kept in need/poor/and suffering all for a specific purpose.

Perhaps he could not in good conscious see the world burn.

Q

153

He spoke to us here. Years ago, now. Read Q 2017 - 2018. He didn't have to do that, either.

>>20070172

No plan survives contact with the enemy, Anon. Adapt and overcome. Always remember the number one mission requirement. 4 - 6%, God Bless 'em.

>>20070190

>>20070197

>>20070203

>Are the ones trying to escape from this madness the ones who might be lost, to the system, forever?

>I've identified your kind writing fiction as far back as the early 70s, by the way. And possibly the 30s. Nothing is real.

I'm an Anon here at /qresearch. The responses I provided were from a Q Post. Q #153. It was left at a forum like this on Nov 14, 2017. We gather to study and discuss these posts here at /qresearch. Welcome.

4 - 6% is the estimated loss in terms of those humans who do not successfully navigate what is to come. Please research for yourself. A genuine attempt has been made to minimize losses.

https://qalerts.net/

>>20070249

>What did you think I meant, faggot?

Honestly Anon I thought you were full-bore coming on to me. Like rubbing my jeans and breathing like Chris Christie on the stairs stuff.

>>20070309

If that were true, why would a wise man ever reply to a narcissist? Destroying a narcissist through inaction is the path of the master.

>>20070345

>Fucking kike glowniggers, man. KYS.

Struggling for words? Out of ideas? Assuming genders? In a state of articulate rage, Anon?

Welcome to /qresearch. It's not easy being green.

>>20070421

I'm an Anon. Here to help. Tried to help by teaching Q #153. It's been a long road since I first learned this. See attached. Lived it and learned it to be valid. Peace.

>>20070480

Wash 'em first.