>P.S. Jarheads are faggots who lick balls and boots.
Kek. At least they don't piss themselves when faced with non civilian resistance.
>Traditionally, a rooster is swung around one’s head and is then slaughtered while being declared a “substitute” for the individual, as an atonement for his or her sins.
Anyone else and it would be "animal cruelty" (linkrel)
https://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/23738023.chicken-punch-case-shows-animal-cruelty-wont-tolerated/
I don't need the Bible to tell me they're evil. I already know. It would behoove you, however, to explain this to all the "Judeo-Christians" and "Christian Zionists" who seem to gloss over this part of their dogma.
Kek
Shut up, Anon! You're going to ruin the big surprise! Kek. Here's some titties to distract you.
>If the supreme court takes Trumps Presidential immunity away.
It means any President, be it former or current, loses their immunity and can be charged for crimes. Presidential Immunity, however, does not extend to Sedition or Treason.
Some crimes, especially involving RICO, typically do not have a half-life, meaning charges can be brought up later, if there is substantial evidence of a crime. For example, Clinton and Dubya would probably not be charged with high crimes, but could be charged with corruption, racketeering, 9-11, etc. POTATUS and Obama, though, well, they're headed for high crimes, so the lesser crimes would be moot and tie them up in the legal system for years before sentencing. That's why Q pointed it out. High Crimes get no appeal.
>They just got done stripping immunity from a cop who handcuffed and forced an 83 year old woman to kneel during a traffic stop.
Government Officials, be it Federal, State, Local or County level should be held to higher standards, anyway. The majority of them are "supposed to know the law" (tm) as a job requirement.
ZING! Give this Anon a shekel! They know if they're held to higher standards (which should be expected) the gravy train runs dry. Not a single one of our "Representatives" in Congress is in office "for the people." Why would the State and Local governments be any different?
>I would of thought Presidential immunity would be different to police immunity?
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_immunity_in_the_United_States
It's all by design, Anon. The shit show we're witnessing currently really shifted gears in the late 1940s, to accelerate morphing us into a dystopia police state. Basically the same timeframe a certain "state" was created, who seems to be a problem for just about every other nation in the world.