>There is no Q anon
There's also the No Such Agency
Weird how it's also in Utah.
>ALL 4A LARP
Not as long as The Hoods openly celebrate murdering The Innocent in the streets and Worshipping the Murderer.
"Say's right here we can steal any memes we want."
https://www.airnav.com/airport/KLNQ
Way down yonder in the PawPaw patch.
Jumping off point for access to the offshore refineries?
>>20072334
>Ok ,question, when Trump is back in office ,how is this fixed
Okay go fuck yourself
What the Fuck does the White House have to do with an argument over french fries and fifty dollar bills?
The cops are going to come write a report and the business owner will file an insurance claim and, if smart, fire anyone stupid enough to go hands on causing damage and liability.
Two wrongs don't make a right.
>>20072417
>No Filters
Always sounded like code for attacking filtered cigarettes in favor of Time, Place, Manner approved Cigars only.
Also, filtering water doesn't remove the Cl⁻ or the F⁻ ions.
Filtering posts is anons discretion, just like filtering their water or smoke.
FACT: The Military Is Punishing Service Members for Their Politics!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIm2i0js18E
According to Congressman Gaetz, the Security Forces Squadron Commander had to get clarification from a Medical Squadron Commander to understand the Civil Rights of Military Members.
Not an opinion from "Base Legal" but instead the Commander had to investigate how attending this Event might affect a "Medical Clearance" to work as a Military Cop.
Medical Intel
"Permanent Record"
Are you also wearing a helmet with an MSF sticker?
>>20072606
Harvesting pigs isn't "Big Game" hunting
C'mon now.
Every now and again anon's ego perks up and wants to namefag a little.
But time after time, we see how well that works out.
"Anon" is moar comfy
>Kimberly said, "the doctor was very sure it was fentanyl."
Oh, "Very Sure."
That's pure Science right there.
Definitely not Mass Hysteria
FENTANYL OOGGA BOOGA
Does that ID her as the Highest Ranking "Wellness" Dealer?
a formidable-looking, stiletto-shaped gold pin on her left lapel. The brooch is a miniature of the speaker’s mace, the official symbol of the House of Representatives, a ceremonial version of which stands on a pedestal to the speaker’s right when the House is in session.
The pin was made by a Texan—jewelry maker Ann Hand, the wife of LBJ confidant and Democratic party éminence grise Lloyd Hand, who came to Washington, D.C., in the sixties, one of the last of the contingent of LBJ-era Texans still in D.C.
“I designed it when she was speaker the first time,” Hand told Texas Monthly from her store in the Georgetown area of D.C. She became enchanted by the mace, which is nearly four feet high and made of silver and ebony, during visits to the House chamber. With a woman as speaker, Hand thought a brooch would be a good fit for her bipartisan line of Americana jewelry. (Hand’s best-seller, popular with Republican women in particular, is an American eagle brooch.) But for some reason, the mace piece didn’t sell well when Pelosi was speaker from 2007 to 2011.
https://www.texasmonthly.com/news-politics/nancy-pelosi-mace-brooch-texan-jeweler/
https://annhand.com/collections/pins/products/mace-pin
>but does not fit well in the Q narrative
They keep pushing wars between monogamists and polygamists.
They really don't care which side wins, as long as the Lifetime Care & Feeding Contract for Women and Children is kept legally saddled to "The Men".
Ruth? As in The Book of Ruth, who lashed her destiny to the life of her Mother In Law?
Someone has never has to attend to Night Shift duties "religiously" to pay their bills.
>Uncensored Profanity
You mean Free Speech?
Unencumbered by arbitrary and capricious censorship which discriminates against the disabled?
>seems to be enjoying it a little too much
Just looking for that clause that limits of "The Pursuit of Happiness" in the Declaration or Consitution.
Sauce your feelings report with a Law or get back in your box, Bitch.
If you're not getting your Fentanyl or Opiates from a Licensed Cartel Dealer, The Biden Admin is coming for you.
A bill of attainder (also known as an act of attainder or writ of attainder or bill of penalties) is an act of a legislature declaring a person, or a group of people, guilty of some crime, and punishing them, often without a trial. As with attainder resulting from the normal judicial process, the effect of such a bill is to nullify the targeted person's civil rights, most notably the right to own property (and thus pass it on to heirs), the right to a title of nobility, and, in at least the original usage, the right to life itself.
The United States Constitution forbids legislative bills of attainder: in federal law under Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 ("No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed"), and in state law under Article I, Section 10. The fact that they were banned even under state law reflects the importance that the Framers attached to this issue.
Within the U.S. Constitution, the clauses forbidding attainder laws serve two purposes. First, they reinforce the separation of powers by forbidding the legislature to perform judicial or executive functions, as a bill of attainder necessarily does. Second, they embody the concept of due process, which is reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.
Every state constitution also expressly forbids bills of attainder.[38][39] For example, Wisconsin's constitution Article I, Section 12 reads:
No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.
In contrast, the Texas Constitution omits the clause that applies to heirs.[40] It is unclear whether a law that called for heirs to be deprived of their estate would be constitutional in Texas.[41]
Supreme Court cases
The U.S. Supreme Court has invalidated laws under the Attainder Clause on five occasions.[42]
Two of the United States Supreme Court's first decisions on the meaning of the bill of attainder clause came after the American Civil War. In Ex parte Garland, 71 U.S. 333 (1866), the court struck down a federal law requiring attorneys practising in federal court to swear that they had not supported the rebellion. In Cummings v. Missouri, 71 U.S. 277 (1867), the Missouri Constitution required anyone seeking a professional's license from the state to swear they had not supported the rebellion. The Supreme Court overturned the law and the constitutional provision, arguing that the people already admitted to practice were subject to penalty without judicial trial.[43] The lack of judicial trial was the critical affront to the Constitution, the Court said.[
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_of_attainder
>The United States Constitution forbids legislative bills of attainder: in federal law under Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 ("No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed"), and in state law under Article I, Section 10. The fact that they were banned even under state law reflects the importance that the Framers attached to this issue.
The United States Constitution forbids legislative bills of attainder: in federal law under Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 ("No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed"), and in state law under Article I, Section 10. The fact that they were banned even under state law reflects the importance that the Framers attached to this issue.
The Legislative Branch, Legislates.
It does not have "arrest" powers delegated to it in the Constitution.
Freedom of Religion not valid in Tennessee
Must Swear an Oath to Christianity to live there.
Pretty sure that meme is banned in 50+ Countries.
Anon chucked a KJV into the Bonfire a few years ago. Felt good.
Just as soon as the Bots in charge of Corporate America Stop Shorting Anon in the Market.
Shrinkflation
$70K for a pickup truck?
Anon needs all the scraps just to survive until death.
Satan is the Supreme Being of the Abrahamic Cults, with the Wives Playing the Role of Accuser, Judge, and Executioner.
>A Higher Loyalty
>Joined
>Anniversary Parties
Imagine being a married SCOTUS and having every future annual BJ on the line, depending on how you rule in some case or another.
Tough spot.