>why are some stories cannon and others not
You tell me why all scholars take the premier Roman historian, Tacitus, as canon IN EVERYTHING he says about everything except for what he wrote about Christos
You know Caligula killed his sister only because Tacitus documented it. You know Boudicca rallied the Isceni celts to fight back against Rome only because Tacitus documented it. You know cleopatra bore Caesar a son ONLY because Tacitus documented it
Why do scholars ands historians take Tacitus as primary documentation on all matters but one? When there is also secondary and tertiary documentation for Christos—. And 0 secondary support documentation anywhere for Boudicca?