Link to all the hearings of the Senate Intelligence Committee
https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/hearings
On the hearing with Victoria Nuland and Michael Daniel
Jun 20, 2018
They give testimony that clarifies – cyber activity only occurred during the primaries.
There was a period of inactivity, and then an uptick in INFORMATION propaganda.
my note:
It seems that the major worry of the Obama WH was — not to lose the confidence of the public in the electoral system. They knew in the Spring of 2016 that there was cyber interference in the electoral systems of the States. (using the fiddling finger, shall we say) After the conventions there was a lull of activity until October, when an INFORMATION campaign began – both of these activities being attributed – to the RUSSIANS.
Those who followed the primary race between Bernie Sanders and HRC – had immediately noticed irregularities in the caucuses (how they were being conducted and controlled) as well as reports of voters' names missing or party affiliation being changed. Some noticed that it was college students or other LIKELY BERNIE VOTERS who were noticing this disenfranchisement.
And the Bernie followers were making noise about it. It was not being glossed over. Evidence was being gathered for a fact-based complaint through legal channels. The Bernie campaign ignored these independent journalists – wouldn't answer the phone calls – did not address it at all. He himself was not going to fight for the nomination. Conclusion? It was a farce. He was being the proverbial "Pied Piper" gathering money and followers to hand over to HRC.
How many of these former Bernie followers do you think voted for Clinton in the General election? ask yourself.
There is no proof that the dilly-dallying with voter rolls was done by Russians. But there is proof that polling places were reduced to half the normal number - in a very active and enthusiastic primary race. This has all been well-documented. One might conclude that it was the Secretaries of States - in charge of all this – that deliberately set the stage for HRC to prevail.
Why would Russia take the risk of an international incident to change data in the voter rolls only during the primary?
Trump was crushing the Republicans.
But – ya, looky there – Hillary couldn't draw a crowd. She needed big time help.
Who was the one who needed help?
Who needed help to win?? in the primaries?
Wasn't Donald Trump. It was HRC.
When you look at a crime - you look at WHO WOULD BENEFIT.