Anon always joins their little religious club when anon gives a loan to the Vatican Bank…
From Thomas Jefferson to Benjamin Rush, 23 September 1800
To Benjamin Rush
Monticello Sep. 23. 1800.
Dear Sir,
I have to acknolege the reciept of your favor of Aug. 22. and to congratulate you on the healthiness of your city. still Baltimore, Norfolk & Providence admonish us that we are not clear of our new scourge. when great evils happen, I am in the habit of looking out for what good may arise from them as consolations to us: and Providence has in fact so established the order of things as that most evils are the means of producing some good. the yellow fever will discourage the growth of great cities in our nation; & I view great cities as pestilential to the morals, the health and the liberties of man. true, they nourish some of the elegant arts; but the useful ones can thrive elsewhere, and less perfection in the others with more health virtue & freedom would be my choice.—I agree with you entirely in condemning the mania of giving names to objects of any kind after persons still living. death alone can seal the title of any man to this honour by putting it out of his power to forfeit it. there is one other mode of rewarding merit which I have often thought might be introduced so as to gratify the living by praising the dead. in giving for instance a commission of chief justice to Bushrod Washington it should be in consideration of his integrity and science in the laws, and of the services rendered to our country by his illustrious relation &c. a commission to a descendant of Dr. Franklin, besides being in consideration of the proper qualifications of the person, should add that of the great services rendered by his illustrious ancestor B.F. by the advancement of science, & by inventions useful to man, &c. I am not sure that we ought to change all our names imposed during the regal government. sometimes indeed they were given through adulation, but often also as the reward of the merit of the times, sometimes for services rendered the colony. perhaps too a name when given should be deemed a sacred property.
I promised you a letter on Christianity, which I have not forgotten. on the contrary it is because I have reflected on it, that I find much more time necessary for it than I can at present dispose of. I have a view of the subject which ought to displease neither the rational Christian or Deist; & would reconcile many to a character they have too hastily rejected. I do not know however that it would reconcile the genus irritabile vatum, who are all in arms against me. their hostility is on too interesting ground to be softened. the delusions into which the XYZ plot shewed it possible to push the people, the successful experiment made under the prevalence of that delusion, on the clause of the constitution which while it secured the freedom of the press, covered also the freedom of religion, had given to the clergy a very favorite hope of obtaining an establishment of a particular form of Christianity thro’ the US. and as every sect believes it’s own form the true one, every one perhaps hoped for it’s own: but especially the Episcopalians & Congregationalists. the returning good sense of our country threatens abortion to their hopes, & they believe that any position of power confided to me will be exerted in opposition to their schemes. and they believe truly. for I have sworn upon the altar of god eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man. but this is all they have to fear from me: & enough too in their opinion; & this is the cause of their printing lying pamphlets against me, forging conversations for me with Mazzei, Bishop Madison &c which are absolute falshoods without a circumstance of truth to rest on; falshoods too of which I acquit Mazzei & Bishop Madison for they are men of truth.—but enough of this. it is more than I have before committed to paper on the subject of all the lies which have been preached or printed against me.—I have not seen the work of Sonnoni which you mention. but I have seen another work on Africa, Parke’s, which I fear will throw cold water on the hopes of the friends of freedom. you will have seen an account of an attempt at insurrection in this state. I am looking with anxiety to see what will be it’s effect on our state. we are truly to be pitied.—I fear we have little chance to see you at the Federal city or in Virginia, & as little at Philadelphia. it would be a great treat to recieve you here. but nothing but sickness could affect that: so I do not wish it. for I wish you health & happiness, and think of you with affection. Adieu.
Th: Jefferson
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-32-02-0102
Dig and decode on the Eye of Providence - Q drop #133 version 7.0 "Many governments of the world feed the ‘Eye’. The Eye of Providence."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_of_Providence
https://symbolsage.com/eye-of-providence-meaning/
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Eye_of_Providence
https://www.catholic.com/qa/gods-all-seeing-eye-isnt-masonic
https://www.catholicbridge.com/catholic/all-seeing-eye-churches.php
https://www.unexpectedtraveller.com/illuminati-symbols-catholic-churches/
https://www.catholic-saints.info/catholic-symbols/eye-christian-symbol.htm
https://www.catholictriparish.org/uploads/8/9/4/5/89454746/signs___symbols.pdf
https://www.ancient-origins.net/human-origins-religions/eye-providence-0013057
https://www.reddit.com/r/Catholicism/comments/zpvrsw/is_this_a_catholic_symbol_specifically_the_eye/
https://www.christianforums.com/threads/why-so-some-many-catholic-churches-have-the-eye-of-providence-in-them-the-same-symbo.7858026/
U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops@USCCBThe all-seeing eye is not a Masonic symbol but represents God's omnipresence. When surrounded by a triangle, it symbolizes the Trinity. 11:02 AM · Dec 18, 2019 https://twitter.com/USCCB/status/1207330423484928006
Nov 11, 2017 11:29:35 PM EST DROP #133 Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: gO/UntOB No. 149063235
Hard to swallow.
Important to progress.
Who are the puppet masters?If Saud, Roths and Soros are the Puppet Masters, why does Q repeat this Question again below?
House of Saud (6+++) - $4 Trillion+
Rothschild (6++) - $2 Trillion+
Soros (6+) - $1 Trillion+
Focus on above(3).
Public wealth disclosures – False.
Many governments of the world feed the‘Eye’.
Think slush funds (feeder).
Think war (feeder).
Think environmental pacts (feeder).
Triangle has(3)sides.
Eye of Providence.==The EYE OF PROVIDENCE is an ancient symbol most commonly associated with Christianity, Catholicism Holy Trinity. The Eye of God is in the Middle of the Triangle.==
Follow the bloodlines.
What is the keystone?SATAN is the keystone? Double meanings exist? (keystone)
Does Satan exist?No.
Does the ‘thought’ of Satan exist?Yes and it is the Thought that Counts.
Who worships Satan?==All Religions which require a Satan, Devil, Negative archetype excuse for evil to exist.==
What is a cult?Noun: cult; plural noun: cults a system of religious veneration and devotion directed toward a particular figure or object.
Epstein island.
What is a temple?Church, Cathedral, building dedicated to a figure or object.
What occurs in a temple?Worship and sacrifice.
Worship?
Why is the temple on top of a mountain?Represents the Mouth of the Diety
How many levels might exist below?Many, arranged like a body
What is the significance of the colors, design and symbol above the dome?Symbology of the Puppet Masters
Why is this relevant?
Who are the puppet masters?Why is Q asking this question again? This means that the above 3 are not the Puppet Masters but the Puppets.
Have the puppet masters traveled to this island?
When? How often? Why?
“Vladimir Putin: The New World Order Worships Satan”
Q
Here are the 3 Keys to the 3 Lock Box that is the Eye of Providence Decode
6+++ Saudi Arabia removed via Purge described in Drops #87, #88 and #95 https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-saudi-royal-purge-with-trumps-consent
6++ Roths removed in too many drops to list here https://www.cnn.com/style/rothschild-family-collection-auction-sold-tan/index.html
6+ Soros removed in too many drops to list here https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-10-12/soros-shutters-offices-across-25-billion-philanthropy-empire
What is a COURT JEW/COURT FACTOR?PART I
In the early modern period, a court Jew, or court factor (German: Hofjude, Hoffaktor; Yiddish: היף איד, romanized: Hoyf Id, קאַורט פאַקטאַר, Kourt Faktor), was a Jewish banker who handled the finances of, or lent money to, European,
mainly German, royalty and nobility. In return for their services, court Jews gained social privileges, including, in some cases, being granted noble status.
Examples of what would be later called court Jews emerged in the High Middle Ages[a] when the royalty, the nobility, and the church borrowed money from money changers or employed them as financiers.
Among the most notable of these were Aaron of Lincoln and Vivelin of Strasbourg.
Jewish financiers could use their family connections to provide their sponsors with finance, food, arms, ammunition, gold, and precious metals.[citation needed]
The rise of the absolute monarchies in Central Europe brought many Jews, mostly of Ashkenazi origin, into the position of negotiating loans for the various courts.
They could amass personal fortunes and gain political and social influence. However, the court Jew had social connections and influence in the Christian world mainly through the Christian nobility and church.
Due to the precarious position of Jews, some nobles could ignore their debts. If the sponsoring noble died, his Jewish financier could face exile or execution.
The most famous example of this occurred in Württemberg when, after the death of his sponsor Charles Alexander in 1737, Joseph Süß Oppenheimer was put on trial and finally executed.[1]
In an effort to avoid such fate, some court bankers in the late 18th century—such as Samuel Bleichröder, Mayer Amschel Rothschild, or Aron Elias Seligmann—successfully detached their businesses from these courts
and established what eventually developed into full-fledged banks.[2]
Prohibited from nearly every other trade, some Jews began to occupy an economic niche as moneylenders in the Middle Ages. Only they were allowed to take interest on loans,
since—while the Church condemned usury universally—canon law was only applied to Christians and not to Jews. Eventually, a sizable sector of the Jewish community were engaged in financial occupations,
and the community was a financially highly successful part of the medieval economy.[3][4] The religious restrictions on moneylending had inadvertently created a source of monopoly rents,
causing profits associated with moneylending to be higher than they otherwise would have been.[5]
By most parameters, the standard of living of the Jewish community in Early Medieval period was at least equal to that of the lower nobility.[6]
However, despite this economic prosperity, the community was not safe: religious hostility increased to the extent that it manifested itself in the form of massacres and expulsions,
Culminating in the repetitive expulsion of all Jews from various parts of Western Europe in the late medieval period.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_Jew
What is a COURT JEW/COURT FACTOR?Part II
Although the phenomenon of "Court Jewry" did not occur until the early 17th century, examples of what would be later called court Jews can be found earlier in Jewish moneylenders
who accumulated enough capital to finance the royalty and the nobility.
Among them was Josce of Gloucester, the Jewish financier who funded Richard de Clare, 2nd Earl of Pembroke's conquest of Ireland in 1170,[7] and Aaron of Lincoln, presumably the wealthiest individual in 12th-century Britain,
who left an estate of about £100,000.[5][8]
Also notable was Vivelin of Strasbourg, one of the wealthiest persons in Europe in the early 14th century, who lent 340,000 florins to Edward III of England on the eve of the Hundred Years' War, in 1339.[9]
By the 16th century, Jewish financiers became increasingly connected to rulers and courts.
Josef Goldschmidt (d. 1572) of Frankfurt, also known as "Jud Joseph zum Goldenen Schwan", became the most important Jewish businessman of his era, trading not only with the Fuggers and Imhoffs,
but also with the nobility and the Church.[10] In the early 17th century the Habsburgs employed the services of Jacob Bassevi of Prague, Joseph Pincherle of Gorizia, and Moses and Jacob Marburger of Gradisca.
At the dawn of mercantilism, while most Sephardi Jews were primarily active in the west in maritime and colonial trade, the Ashkenazi Jews in the service of the emperor and princes tended toward domestic trade.[11]
They were mostly wealthy businessmen, distinguished above their co-religionists by their commercial instincts and their adaptability. Court Jews frequently came into conflict with court rivals and co-religionists.
The court Jews, as the agents of the rulers, and in times of war as the purveyors and the treasurers of the state, enjoyed special privileges.
They were under the jurisdiction of the court marshal, and were not compelled to wear the Jews' badge.
They were permitted to stay wherever the Emperor held his court, and to live anywhere in the Holy Roman Empire, even in places where no other Jews were allowed.
Wherever they settled they could buy houses, slaughter meat according to the Jewish ritual, and maintain a rabbi. They could sell their goods wholesale and retail, and could not be taxed or assessed higher than the Christians.
Jews were sometimes assigned the role of local tax collectors.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_Jew