Don't start no case, won't be no case.
Comfy
>One thing for certain is that we learned a lot more about those people than we would have if they were not picked.
Dark -Light
Lights On
Cabal has been associated with a group of five ministers in the government of England's King Charles II. The initial letters of the names or titles of those men (Clifford, Arlington, Buckingham, Ashley, and Lauderdale) spelled cabal, and they have been collectively dubbed as the "Cabal Cabinet" or "Cabal Ministry." But these five names are not the source of the word cabal, which was in use decades before Charles II ascended the throne. The term traces back to cabbala, the Medieval Latin name for the Kabbalah, a traditional system of esoteric Jewish mysticism. Latin borrowed Cabbala from the Hebrew qabbālāh, meaning "received or traditional lore."
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cabal
>The Babylonian Talmud,
or Bavli, was composed by rabbis who flourished from the third to the sixth or seventh centuries CE. Babylonian rabbis lived under Sasanian Persian domination between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, in what corresponds to part of modern-day Iraq. The Bavli consists primarily of tannaitic, amoraic, and unattributed statements (stam), although many post-talmudic comments were added to the text during the lengthy course of its transmission from late antiquity to the present.
Tannaitic statements, or baraitot, comprise the Bavli’s earliest layer, dating from the first century CE until the early third century CE. Virtually all tannaitic statements derive from Palestine, although a small number of Tannaim lived in Babylonia. Amoraic statements derive from rabbis who lived between the early third and the early sixth centuries CE in Babylonia, and between the early third and the late fourth centuries CE in Palestine. Unattributed materials in the Bavli tend to be later, to post-date the amoraic layer, although some of this material may derive from the amoraic period, particularly from the mid-fourth century CE and later. Identification of the unattributed materials is facilitated by their unique stylistic characteristics, most notably their character as lengthy, Aramaic argumentation. Tannaitic and amoraic materials, in contrast, are often in Hebrew and tend to be prescriptive and interpretive. In addition, tannaitic and amoraic argumentation tends to be relatively brief.
<~~un~~written knowledge
https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-history-of-judaism/formation-and-character-of-the-babylonian-talmud/3AB1E6460141120778DE91131A50EAB4
Retlif On
CuBa iS nIcE