Anonymous ID: a0c373 Dec. 27, 2023, 6:28 a.m. No.20137308   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7426 >>7484 >>7635 >>7715

Biden signs order finalizing 5.2% pay raise for feds in 2024

 

The measure confirms that the federal workforce will see its largest pay increase in more than 40 years.

 

ERICH WAGNER | DEC 21, 2023

 

President Biden on Thursday issued an executive order implementing his plan to provide civilian federal workers with an average 5.2% pay raise next month.

 

As first proposed in his fiscal 2024 budget plan last March, the increase amounts to a 4.7% across-the-board boost to basic pay, alongside an average 0.5% increase in locality pay. As authorized in the fiscal 2024 National Defense Authorization Act, which Biden is expected to sign this week, military service personnel also will see an average 5.2% pay raise next year.

 

An average 5.2% pay increase marks the largest authorized for federal workers since the Carter administration adopted a 9.1% average raise in 1980, as well as a 0.6% increase over last year’s raise, which itself marked a 20-year high.

 

On top of the historic pay increase, tens of thousands of federal employees will see a slightly larger increase than expected, thanks to a slew of recent changes in the locality pay system. Last year, the President’s Pay Agent, a body made up of Office of Personnel Management Director Kiran Ahuja, Office of Management and Budget Director Shalanda Young and Acting Labor Secretary Julie Su, approved the creation of four new locality pay areas. And the body finally adopted plans to update the map of locality pay areas using new OMB data, adding dozens of counties to existing locality pay areas.

 

The Office of Personnel Management must now publish pay tables outlining the pay raise across all General Schedule pay grades and locality pay areas. Once updated, they will be available on the agency’s website.

 

The pay raise will go into effect for the first full pay period of 2024, which for most feds begins Jan. 14.

 

(Bribes come in handy during a Presidential Election Year!)

 

https://www.govexec.com/pay-benefits/2023/12/biden-signs-order-finalizing-52-pay-raise-feds-2024/392978/

Anonymous ID: a0c373 Dec. 27, 2023, 7:11 a.m. No.20137429   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7447 >>7484 >>7635 >>7715

 

 

FBI shocker: Agent told boss Biden laptop could be Russian disinformation, but team knew otherwise

1/3Dec. 26, 2023

The FBI agent who ran the bureau’s Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF) during the 2020 election admitted in Congressional testimony that he advised his leadership that Hunter Biden’s laptop could be part of a Russian disinformation campaign, apparently unaware his team already knew that the FBI had obtained and corroborated the computer as “real,” according to interview transcripts reviewed by Just the News.

 

Retired FBI Special Agent Bradley Benavides' account to the House Judiciary Committee comes as congressional investigators gather mounting evidence that the government's early efforts to identify andblock alleged misinformation in politics have been so haphazard as to inject inaccurate, speculative, or incomplete information themselves into the public domain.

 

Benavides served as the very firstFBI section chief for the Foreign Influence Task Force(FITF), a new entity created during the 2020 electionto issue warnings to other bodies in government and the private sector about possible foreign misinformation or disinformation. (This was a task force set up to defeat Trump! Imo)

 

“I remember aquestion being posed broadlyif there was a laptop purported to be attributed to Hunter Biden, is it possible that a foreign adversary, like the Russians, could be using that as a way to insert into the U.S. political system false information, bad information, corrupted information, all kinds of things that could be on the laptop? Is it possible, FITF, that the Russians are capable of doing this? And my response would have been yes,” Benavides told the House Judiciary Committee in a Sept. 28 transcribed interview reviewed by Just the News.

 

The FBI effort has drawn increased scrutiny because its work often was cited as a basis for censorship of news and opinion content on social media during the election. The New York Times, for example, did not acknowledge the existence of the laptop or its contents until more than a year after the 2020 election.

 

The task force was one of the bodies cited by a federal appellate court for banning federal agencies from having censorship-related contacts with Big Tech platforms ahead of the 2024 election. Thefederal government continues to deny any collaboration with media in papersfiled to the United States Supreme Court last week.

 

Benavides said he received arequest for his input on the Hunter Biden laptop before the November 2020 electionfrom Executive Assistant DirectorJohn Brown, then the No. 3 national security official at the bureau behind the Director and Deputy Director.

 

“It was broad,” Benavides said of the question Brown asked. “It would have been, is it possible that the Russians had the sophistication, the capabilities to potentially insert a laptop purported to be associated with Hunter Biden? It would have been a broad question based on my recollection.”

 

Benavides told the committee he had not done any research on the laptop beforehand and never looked further into whether the laptop was real after giving Brown his answer.(WTF, really uncurious Agents and Leaders?)

 

“Did you have to take anything back to your team or conduct your own analysis, or you just were able to provide an answer immediately?” the retired agent was asked.

 

“I would have provided the answer immediately based on my understanding of sophisticated Russian operations,” Benavides answered.

 

“Did you do anything else after this conversation with him?” he was pressed.

 

“Not that I immediately recall. Not that I recall,” he answered.

 

His answer has caught lawmakers’ attention, in part because a fellow FBI agent named Laura Dehmlow, who succeeded Benavides as the FITF section chief, told the same committee in her interview that task force members, including herself,already knew by fall 2020 – before the election– that Hunter Biden’slaptop had been corroboratedand even told social media companies during one of the task force’s meetings in October 2020 with social media companies' executives.

 

“I remember having a conversation with or being involved in a conversation with Twitter, and I honestly can’t recall if this was repeated to me – I might have been a few minutes late to the meeting – or if – or if I was – I actually overheard it,” Dehmlow said in her interview. “But it was – it was relayed to me later that somebody from Twitter – I don’t recall who. I’m not sure who. Somebody from Twitter essentially asked whether the laptop was real. And one of the FBI folks who was on the call did confirm that, ‘yes, it was,’ before anotherparticipant jumped in and said, ‘no further comment.’”…

 

https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/tufbi-shocker-key-agent-told-boss-hunter-biden-laptop-could-be

Anonymous ID: a0c373 Dec. 27, 2023, 7:18 a.m. No.20137447   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7457 >>7715

>>20137429

2/3

 

“When the information was relayed to you following the Twitter call, the first agent had said the laptop was real. Just to clarify,you knew prior to that conversation that the laptop was real. Is that correct?” she was asked.

 

"I did, yes,”she answered.

 

Later Dehmlow was pressed for more details. “Do you knowwho else at FITF knew that the laptop was real?”a committee lawyer asked.

 

"I don’t actually. I would assume both my – yes, I would certainly say thatBrad Benavides was aware,” she answered.

 

“What about the individuals on the Russia unit?” she was asked.

 

“I would assume the unit chief was also aware. I’m pretty certain of that fact,” she added.

 

Documents recently released by Congress from two IRS whistleblowers show the FBI had determined that a laptop Hunter Biden abandoned at a Delaware repair shop that was handed over to agents under a federal grand jury subpoena had been authenticated by the FBI as early as 2019 and that the possibility ofRussian disinformation on it was already ruled out by early 2020.

 

Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan is pressing FBI Director Christopher Wray on the work of the FITF and other bodies created by the federal government in the name of fighting disinformation, citing testimony and documents showingfederal disinformation hunters sometimes created their own false impressionby making proclamations without full evidence to back it up.

 

For instance, 51 intelligence officials signed a letter in October 2020 claiming the Biden laptop could be Russian disinformation without citing any evidence, and memos dug up by Jordan evidence that the letter was instigated by now-Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, then a staffer with Joe Biden’s campaign, to create a “talking point” at the last presidential debate.

 

“The refusal ofFBI officials—the very officials who knew the laptop was real—to verify the authenticity of the laptopallowed widespread censorshipabout an otherwise accurate news story,” Jordan wrote Wray in a letter earlier this year.

 

In his historic ruling in July banning federal agencies from further censorship activities with Big Tech firms,Judge Terry Doughtyof the United States District Court of Louisianasingled out the FBI Foreign Influence Task Forcefor behavior that chilled the First Amendment’s guarantee to free speech. “A significant number of FBI officials from the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force also participate in regular meetings with social-media platforms about disinformation,” the judge noted.

 

He added: “TheFBIwas included in Industry meetings and bilateral meetings, received and forwarded alleged misinformation to social-media companies, andactually mislead social-media companies in regard to the Hunter Biden laptop story. The Court finds this evidence demonstrative of significant encouragement by the FBI Defendant.”

 

Benavides was asked about Dehmlow’s claims and insisted he did not know the laptop was “real” and that he did not try to determine if it was in the FBI’s hands after he gave his answer to the executive assistant director.

 

“I don't know what 'real' means, and I would need context for that,” he told the committee. “And I can't put myself in Laura's testimony to understand what she might have been trying to convey based on the question that was asked to her.” (Clinton language)

 

Committee lawyers pressed further: “Did you have any knowledge of the FBI's possession of any laptop, regardless of whether the laptop had been authenticated, determined to be Hunter Biden's laptop, determined to be a version of Hunter Biden's laptop possibly corrupted, possession of any 24 laptop whatsoever connected to this issue?

 

“I was aware of a public narrative around this generally. I assessed, based on John's question, that the FBI might be in possession of the laptop. I was never told, nor would I have asked, ‘Does the FBI have this laptop?’ I would not have done that,” he answered.

 

Benavidesalso confirmed to Congress thathe was part of a briefing to Sens. Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson in summer 2020that warned some of the information they were collecting in their probe of Biden family influence peddling and the millions in foreign dollars it collected might have been fanned by Russia through a Ukrainian lawmaker aligned with Putin.

 

“I would have been in the room for that. I would not have delivered the defensive brief,” he explained,identifying his boss, Nikki Floris,as the agent which gave the briefing.

 

(They sound dumb but the are not, deny, deny, deny!)

Anonymous ID: a0c373 Dec. 27, 2023, 7:22 a.m. No.20137457   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7484 >>7635 >>7715

>>20137447

3/3

 

Though anFBI agent gave the briefing, Benavides said the information in itwas not derivedfrom bureau sources or corroborated by the FBI. Ratherit came from other intelligence agenciesand forwarded to the FBI through an interagency body known as theCredibility Assessment Group. As such, the FBI agents simply read material unverified by the FBI to the senators. That material was provided to the FBI by other intelligence agency components through the the Office of Director of National Intelligence, he said.

 

“She would have read verbatim the contents of the script,” he said.

 

Benavides said the FBI would not authenticate the informationitself but instead rely on its credibility because other agencies had vetted it.

 

“You cannot definitely say in this particular instance, you cannot vouch for the veracity of the intelligence,” he was asked.

 

“I cannot,” he answered.

 

(The IC has this secret maneuver to blame others for their lack of knowledge. Classic case of “dodge and weave”)

Anonymous ID: a0c373 Dec. 27, 2023, 7:36 a.m. No.20137489   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7635 >>7715

Plagued by plagiarism scandal, Harvard's political donations flood to Democrats

 

As Harvard faces increasing pressure to fire its embattled president, theuniversity's insular culture and one-sided politicsare under the microscope.

 

So far in the2024 election cycle, Harvardemployeesincluding professors and administratorshave made more than 100 donations of $1,000 or more to politicians. All but three went to Democrats. Two of the three Republican donations went to candidates trying to take down Donald Trump in the party’s presidential primary.

 

This weekend, a Washington Post op-ed by deputy editorial page editor Ruth Marcus called on President Claudine Gay to resign. “She plagiarized her acknowledgments. I take no joy in saying this, but (she) ought to resign. Her track record is unbefitting the president of the country’s premier university,” Marcus wrote.

 

Last week, The New York Times reported that top governing officials for the Ivy League school met to plot a course out of the mess plaguing the university with amore than $50 billion endowment.

 

Harvard has taken the hot seat after the University of Pennsylvania's president resigned in the wake of botched Congressional testimony about anti-Semitism at the schools.

 

Pennhas a similarlyone-sided donation profilewith all the top donations in recent years going to Democrats.

 

Jennifer Kabbany, editor of The College Fix, which tracks political correctness at universities nationwide, saysthe donations mask a deeper problemat universities, “Theolder, classically liberal (professors)who tended to support free speech, academic freedom and intellectual diversityare retiring. They are being replaced with younger, more radical scholars who use the classroom for activism and indoctrination rather than education. These new scholars tend to be far more politically active.” She argues that this transition has turnedschools into one-party “echo chambers.”

 

 

https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/plagued-plagiarism-scandal-harvards-political-donations-flood-democrats

Anonymous ID: a0c373 Dec. 27, 2023, 7:42 a.m. No.20137509   🗄️.is 🔗kun

December 27, 2023 9:04am

Michigan Supreme Court keeps Trump on 2024 primary ballot

 

The Michigan Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed former President Donald Trump to remain on the state's Republican presidential primary ballot after it declined to take up an appeal to have him disqualified.

 

The court said in a brief order that it denied the appeal because it was"not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court."

 

The Colorado Supreme Court removed Trump from the state's primary ballot last week, citing the U.S. Constitution's insurrection clause that prohibits people who participated in an uprising against the country from holding federal office. Trump vowed to appeal the ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court.

 

Justice Elizabeth Welch, one of the four Democratic-nominated justices on the seven-member Michigan Supreme Court,dissented.

 

She argued that while she would uphold the Court of Appeals' ruling finding that Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson is not required to determine a presidential primary candidate's eligibility, a high court ruling as such would allow "appellants to renew their legal efforts as to the Michigan general election later in 2024 should Trump become the Republican nominee for president of the United States or seek such office as an independent candidate."

 

(Welch just invited more appeals on eliminating Trump!)

 

https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/michigan-supreme-court-keeps-trump-2024-primary-ballot

Anonymous ID: a0c373 Dec. 27, 2023, 7:48 a.m. No.20137521   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7635 >>7715

New York Times sues OpenAI, Microsoft for alleged copyright infringement

Dec. 27, 2023

 

The New York Times filed a lawsuit Wednesday against OpenAI and Microsoft for alleged copyright infringement, sparking a legal battle that has long-term implications for the future of media.

 

Automated chatbots were trained with millions of Times articles, andnow artificial intelligence is generating content that competes with the New York outlet, according to a 69-page lawsuit filed in Manhattan's federal district court. (So AI is making up propaganda like the NYTs, kinda ironic. Kek)

 

The Times says in the lawsuit that OpenAI and Microsoft should be held liable for "billions of dollars in statutory and actual damages" related to the "unlawful copying and use ofThe Times's uniquely valuable works." (Seriously?)

 

The Times is the first major U.S. media organization to sue the companies that created popular AI platforms – including ChatGPT – over copyright problems related to writing.

 

https://justthenews.com/accountability/media/new-york-times-sues-openai-microsoft-alleged-copyright-infringement

Anonymous ID: a0c373 Dec. 27, 2023, 7:59 a.m. No.20137561   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7573 >>7635 >>7715

North Carolina election board unanimous in primary ballot decision: Joe Biden lone Democrat

Dec.26, 2023

 

When Super Tuesday rolls around in 10 weeks for North Carolinians, there’ll be just one choice for Democrats and the favorite choice per polling for Republicans.

 

President Joe Biden will be the only name available on the Democratic primary ballot, the state’s Board of Elections has confirmed by unanimous vote. That vote by three Democrats and three Republicans also included the Grand Old Party primary ballot to beinclusive of seven names, headlined by former President Donald Trump.

 

December has been a month fraught not only with arguments but litigations to Trump being included on ballots, climaxed by seven Colorado justices — all appointed by Democratic governors — delivering a historic ruling. They cited Section 3 of the 14th Amendment in keeping Trump off the ballot; appeals are expected at the U.S. Supreme Court. (Actually 3 dissented, it was 4 to 3)

 

The announcement from North Carolina’s board was the fourth instance of Rep. Dean Phillips, D-Minn., being unable to get on a ballot. His longshot challenge to Biden was also blunted in Florida, Tennessee and Massachusetts. Author Marianne Williamson and progressive commentator Cenk Uygur were others bidding.

 

Theseven Republicanson North Carolina’s primary ballot in addition to Trump are Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson, and pastor and businessman Ryan Binkley. At the fourth GOP debate earlier this month in Alabama, the stage included DeSantis, Haley, Ramaswamy and Christie, who are respectively the consensus closest to Trump in polling.

 

As of Tuesday,Trump collectively polls at 62.4% among Republicans, with DeSantis at 11.7%, Haley at 10.8% and Ramaswamy at 4%, according to FiveThirtyEight.com. Of 26 polls listed where the survey began in December, Trump’s worst showing is a head-to-head among less than 500 registered voters against DeSantis (59%-25%). In six polls of at least 1,600 registered voters, Trump outdistances all choices by no less than 50% (Ipsos, sample size 1,689, Trump 61%, DeSantis 11%, Haley 11%, Ramaswamy 5%).

 

The candidate lists were submitted by the respective parties. Libertarians submitted a list of 10, and all will be on the primary ballot. The Green Party did not submit candidates for the primary but can nominate a candidate for the Nov. 5 general election. The No Labels Party nominates general election candidates by convention rather than primary.

 

In-person early voting for the primaries begins Feb. 15 and runs through March 2. Super Tuesday is March 5.

 

(How did NC get so radical blue?)

 

https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/state-board-unanimous-primary-ballot-decision

Anonymous ID: a0c373 Dec. 27, 2023, 8:18 a.m. No.20137615   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7635 >>7715

The Complete 2024 Presidential Primary Schedule by State

 

The 2024 presidential primary schedule is listed below with the date of each state’s primary and caucus for Democrats and Republicans in the 2024 presidential primary. From the Iowa caucuses to Election Day on November 5, 2024, here is a look at which states vote when, and where the largest number of delegates are awarded. This page will be constantly updated with the latest information about voting dates, voting times, and delegates awarded by each primary and caucus on the 2024 presidential election calendar.

Super Tuesday in 2024 will tentatively take place on Tuesday, March 5.

 

All dates are subject to change as some states have yet to officially decide on their primary or caucus voting day. Due to changes in the Democratic primary calendar, some early states have not decided how they will award delegates to the Democratic National Convention. These states include Iowa and New Hampshire which have been replaced as early states but still intend to hold their own contests in violation of DNC rules. Republicans will stick with the historically traditional Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, and South Carolina path. Democrats have embraced South Carolina and Michigan as their starting primary states in 2024.

 

Primary/Caucus Type

Open – Voters may vote in either party primary regardless of voter party registration but can choose only one primary to vote in

Closed – Only voters registered in their respective party may vote in the party primary

Mixed – A semi-open or a semi-closed environment, unaffiliated voters can choose to vote in either primary or voters can switch registration on the day of voting

 

Delegate Allocation

Democratic primary/caucus delegates are proportionally allocated to the candidates based on their percent share of the vote.

 

Republican primaries/caucuses delegatesare winner-take-all meaning that the winner of the contest takes all of the available delegates.

 

Proportional – Delegates are awarded based on the percentage of the vote received by candidates, or some formulation of dividing up the delegates

 

Winner Take All – All delegates are given to the winner of the contest

Winner Take Most – Some delegates are reserved for the winner, some may be divided proportionally

 

Unbound – Delegates are not bound to a specific candidate and can support any candidate of their choosing, varies by the state party organization

 

(It’s weird how many republican states are having Open Primaries in 2024.Go to link to see list and dates of primariies)

 

2024 Primary Schedule

 

https://www.uspresidentialelectionnews.com/2024-primary-schedule/