For the past couple days I’ve been conducting an informal experiment on Q Research.
Basically, I would run two separate lanes:
In lane one I would contribute what anons would generally consider “on brand” information; ie news about Trump, politics, law enforcement action, etc.
In lane two I would purposely agitate anons with anti-Trump messaging, progressive talking points, headlines unfavorable to Trump, etc.
The results of this experiment essentially proved that with pro-Trump content, I hardly got any engagement at all. With anti-Trump content, my engagement went through the roof. So ultimately, theres an incentive structure to “shill”, as it were. Anons here seem to be motivated by negativity and anger. Anons prefer arguing and bickering rather than reaching agreement. My testing isn’t finished yet, but that’s generally my main takeaway.