Thanks Baker! I appreciate you! o7
What's that philosophy called? Philosophy of the filturd?
Read Thomas Aquinas papers on contingency. In the meantime enjoy the silence.
Your ID added up equals a big fatZERO.
Are we fishing or cutting bait? Between you two, it appears that you care about how to cut the bait. Buh-bye.
Retards trying to give philosophical wisdomโฆ
PSA
ANONS! STOP REAL QUICK!
HAMMER TIME!!!
>Well Haley has lost some potential voters tonight.
What voters did she have to begin with? Military complex special interests and people who spend money for overpriced clothing at Von Maur retail stores?
Okay, I counted nine in that photoโฆ But sure as shit ain't enough to win.
Any mathematic Anon input would be appreciated!
Oh my word!!!
Spin machine still fully operationalโฆ
1) Your grammar blows.
2) Rooted Android Device with full location spoofing capabilities.
3) Cyanogen Mod flashed OS still running Lollipop OS.
4) VPN capabilities.
5) Behind Seven Proxy Servers.
Any questions?
So by your logicโฆ
JFK Jr JFK > JFK Jr born after JFKโฆ
However if JFK JR =JFK how would such be possible if JFK born first. Maybe we can figure this out by answering the following question:
cos2 (x) + sin2 (x) = (eix + e-ix )2 /4 + sin2 (x) = (e2ix + e-2ix )/4 + e2ln(sin(x)) + 1/2
Not hacking, a little research will go a long way. Simply giving you, as the user full Super User (admin) access to your device. Which should be common sense and everyone should want. Although, most don't want admin access to their devices as long as "it's working".
Three Sigmas, we talking thee standard deviations instead of the actual answer then?
Three sigma follows the 68-95-99.7
Interesting right? I dream of the day human kind can openly discuss the love of wisdom.
You didn't solve the equation I originally asked. Try again!!!
>cos2 (x) + sin2 (x) = (eix + e-ix )2 /4 + sin2 (x) = (e2ix + e-2ix )/4 + e2ln(sin(x)) + 1/2
Solved. Thanks for putting me in coach!!!
Your almost correct. Not quite, if I may explain.
If an attacker knows a message, it should be difficult for them to find another
message that has the same digest.
Collision resistance states that it should be difficult to find any pair (x, y)
such that
h(x) = h(y).
Furthermore, it should be difficult to find any two messages that have the same
digest. Collision attacks alone are usually without practical applications, but they
can signal a weakness in the hash function. Collision resistance implies second pre-
image resistance, while second pre-image resistance does not guarantee pre-image
resistance. Finding collisions via brute fore does not have a complexity of 2n
. For
instance, consider the birthday problem. The number of hash values needed to find
two collisions with probability p is given as
n(n, H) โ
s
2H ln
1
1 โ p
where H is the number of possible hash values. For instance, if we want p = .5,
then n(0.5, H) โ
โ
H. A hash function with an n bit digest will only provide n/2
bits of security for collision resistance assuming this is an ideal hash function. If we
want 128 bits worth of security against collision attacks, we need a hash function
with at least 256 bits of digest.
Message checksum requires that the integrity of the message is checked for acci-
dental corruption. Usually, it is computed using a noncryptographic hash function.
For instance, this could be of the form
checksum = crc32(message).
Message digest is similar to checksum, but it is calculated using a cryptographic
hash function, and could be of the form
digest = SHA3(message).
The digest detects malicious modifications. However, it does not protect against
MITM if the message and digest are both susceptible to tampering. It is still useful
for file checksums. The message authentication code (MAC) is similar to digest
but can only be computed and verified using a secret. A possible implementation is
MAC = h(secret|message).
MAC confirms the integrity of the message and the authenticity of the message. In
this way, it can protect against MITM attacks. MAC is used to compute and verify
the tag of a message. A keyed-hash message authentication code (HMAC) is
a particular implementation of MAC. It is defined in RFC 2104, and is currently the
most popular MAC. It defends against length-extension attacks. It is of the form
HMAC = h(k1|h(k2|m)).
https://timetravel-1.github.io/Website/files/CPSC%20329.pdf
Furthermore, installing a custom ROM (Read only memory) means full user adjustment to a devices OS I/O functionality (especially Android/Linux devices). Location, MAC, UID addresses discernable to the admin of the device.
TLTR:
>cos2 (x) + sin2 (x) = (eix + e-ix )2 /4 + sin2 (x) = (e2ix + e-2ix )/4 + e2ln(sin(x)) + 1/2
Equals 1?
Thanks Anons. Have a good night and get some sleep! o7