There were overlapping conversations going on two breads ago, painting a picture of what's going to happen next. Q showed up in response to an anon:
>>2013625
Q's response:
>>2014158
Theorizing how it all fits together:
>>2013732
>>2013760
>>2013829
>>2013964
>>2014138
>>2014248
I'm not sure if it's notable, but if other anons think so, it might be revealing how DOJ works with MI as per EO to take them all down.
I would say leave it alone. Time conversions are shit, but what's important is that the times match up to the tweets (which they do). The clockfags are working on a prediction tool that's broken, and if that's who's complaining, I'd leave it alone.
Well? Knowing what we know about glow-in-the-darks, the cabal, state leaders being puppets/controlled, and painting Russia as the bad guy (in conjunction with that Q crumb I linked to you in response) how does this description now read?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO
NATO was little more than a political association until the Korean War galvanized the organization's member states, and an integrated military structure was built up under the direction of two US Supreme Commanders.
>Korean war happened, and solidified NATO (it may have already been comped? Maybe that happened later on with clandestine ops?).
After the fall of the Berlin Wall in Germany in 1989, the organization conducted its first military interventions in Bosnia from 1992 to 1995 and later Yugoslavia in 1999 during the breakup of Yugoslavia.[5] Politically, the organization sought better relations with former Warsaw Pact countries, several of which joined the alliance in 1999 and 2004.
>Were these nations refusing the cabal, and NATO was used to "bring them to heel"?
Article 5 of the North Atlantic treaty, requiring member states to come to the aid of any member state subject to an armed attack, was invoked for the first and only time after the September 11 attacks,[6] after which troops were deployed to Afghanistan under the NATO-led ISAF.
>Ah, more cabal shit post 9/11.
I'm guessing NATO started as a good idea, then became a tool for the cabal. Hence, Trump's disdain for the entire fucking thing. He kept saying, over and over, more nations needed to pay their fair share. I'm wondering if some of the money laundering that was going on with Iran, EU and others, was being used for NATO, and Trump was sending a warning shot to them with his NATO references?
Q hasn't said anything speficially about NATO, but that might be because he was able to get that under control using the powers of the office of POTUS (maybe it wasn't comped, per se, but being used wrongly). Either that, or its budget was being siphoned by bad actors (foreign states working for the cabal).
Hard to say!
I want to say that anons nearly confirmed that Lyn De Rothschild herself was here on a couple of occasions shouting and screaming. Shortly afterward, her Twitter was deleted (by her).
Anon, the shills that are here, likely, are probably 10% actual people that come here by way of chance, see the shit flinging between real anons and "the paid shills", and drop a comment and check out. The other 90% or likely:
Cabal themselves
People that works at disinfo operations paid for by the cabal.
Naive staffers working for the DNS that have caught wind of this place, and play cubicle-tag with anons as a demotivation campaign (looking at you liberal ladies and your titsfagging the place up).
Seriously, Q has been at this since October. The shills, in response, have been at this since then as well. WHY. IN. THE. HELL? Because what's happening here is real. In the entire history of the web, has there ever been something going on this long, with as much fact, as this?
If Q is just a news aggregate (Drudge playing us all for fools), then he's on those sources to match his claims pretty quick. It'd make more sense if it's a team of folks, working as insiders, with a clear view of the "script" or "scripts" at play here.