Anonymous ID: 1a3752 Dec. 30, 2023, 5:20 p.m. No.20155836   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5847

>>20155811

>โ€ฆIn regards to baking, if you must fucking know. Why anon bakes, baking style , being as impartial as humanly possible and the sparse notes anon collects, avoiding click bait.

Yeah, that's not what I was thinking about, in the slightest, but you do you.

Anonymous ID: 1a3752 Dec. 30, 2023, 5:28 p.m. No.20155882   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>20155847

>โ€ฆYou can have your paranoid delusions.

Ah, Projection. How I missed theeโ€ฆ.

>Anon was straight forward.

But your "straight forwardness" had nothing at all to do with what I asked? Unless you're admitting that the BO "declares the narrative" regardless of it's truth or not? Considering you ended your first sentence with "if you must fucking know" shows a hint of derision on your part, as though you were somehow superior to others for 1) getting emails from the BO and 2) baking in general, which means you're not as "impartial" as you wish to portray.

Anonymous ID: 1a3752 Dec. 30, 2023, 7:14 p.m. No.20156416   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>20156405

>1 out of how many though?

That's precisely why you should laugh. They've made it "clear" the swatting is by "the Left." Now all of the sudden, "the Right" is doing the swatting? It's the whole muh "Republicans and Democrats switched" (tm) slide.