Anonymous ID: 048e89 Jan. 1, 2024, 9:25 a.m. No.20164542   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4558 >>4564 >>4601

I just realized. The mimic/HandMeDown bakes. Kind of blows his whole "nameless faceless fearless" arguments he tries using on everyone, when the dumbfuck uses a unique banner to stand out when he's baking, on that persona that is. The retards run multiple personas, because that's how scared they are. Kind of like the Wizard of Oz, but inverted morally and spiritually. Bakers are the elites. Anons are the plebians. Hell, the bakers even tell the board owner and site owner off if they're displeased, that's how much power they think they wield here. Just an observation/extrapolation.

Anonymous ID: 048e89 Jan. 1, 2024, 9:59 a.m. No.20164687   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4699

I remember when that football player had a heart attack on the field and that fat doctor on Faux looked panicked, scared, and desperately was pushing commodito corditis. I have a feeling that bitch is going to be on the bad end of what's coming.

Anonymous ID: 048e89 Jan. 1, 2024, 10:09 a.m. No.20164723   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>20164704

Yeah, board gay are like the shills and their propaganda; like Shake & Bake they combine they forces to form Fake & Gay. Then there's the IRL pole smokers that suck dick with their ass, like Barry "In the Butt" Obama.

Anonymous ID: 048e89 Jan. 1, 2024, 10:20 a.m. No.20164772   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4853

>>20164755

Oh, I completely know and understand that, I'm not complaining about it, just highlighting the hypocrisy. A butthurt clown baker harps on Anons while himself using a personalized banner and the memes of the Anons he's harping on. He's allowed to stand out in his little pea brain because he's a baker, because of who he works for, but lowly Anons that meme and criticize the shills and their narratives can't?

Anonymous ID: 048e89 Jan. 1, 2024, 10:41 a.m. No.20164858   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4950

>>20164840

> It worked.

Couldn't help but notice you used the past tense. Works no longer then? Bakers are no better than anyone else especially when it's the role the clowns exploit. Kind of why I rarely thank a baker anymoar. I'd rather thank Anons for what they do. I had one baker say to me in response to my refusal to bake, "What? You can't copypaste?" I posted a meme paralleling that above.

Anonymous ID: 048e89 Jan. 1, 2024, 10:45 a.m. No.20164875   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

I'm not complaining, I'm not trying to be divisive, though I can see how this line of thought can be, I'm just explaining my point of view after being attacked by a clown baker for 6 months now, all because he's butthurt the BVs remove the MuhJoo spam.

Anonymous ID: 048e89 Jan. 1, 2024, 10:49 a.m. No.20164898   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>20164860

>my take was that anonymity was preferred because otherwise one would get targetted or imitated.

And some don't care if they're targeted or imitated because that provides an even bigger spotlight for their malevolent behavior.

Anonymous ID: 048e89 Jan. 1, 2024, 11:13 a.m. No.20165026   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

See, now they're whining about the Anons that stand up to them and trying to generate a false consensus around that. It's like they deem themselves the gatekeepers of acceptable personalities because the Anons they attack don't have narratives. "Good morning, Frenz" and "America Winning" posted repetitively must be destroyed at all costs because that's a message they do not control.