Thank you, baker.
o7
>>20168431 all pb:
>>20167039, >>20167051, >>20167060, >>20167079, >>20167380
These posts were not deleted from the thread, just taken as a notable bun.
No substance, no sauce, no newspeg, no new info.
Are you the hall monitor?
it's the old red text in the middle glitch, kek
REPOST for this brea:
Giuffre v. Maxwell (1:15-cv-07433)- correct maxwell case jordan sather
Jordan Sather@JordanSather
We could get the NEW unsealings in the Giuffre vs. Ghislaine Maxwell defamation case as early as tomorrow (the "new Epstein names" everyone is excited for)
When anything official gets released, I imagine it'll be published here -

Giuffre v. Maxwell (1:15-cv-07433)
District Court, S.D. New York
 Add Note
 Tags Get AlertsToggle Dropdown View on PACERToggle Dropdown
Last Updated: Jan. 1, 2024, 8:13 p.m.
Assigned To: Loretta A. Preska
Citation: Giuffre v. Maxwell, 1:15-cv-07433, (S.D.N.Y.)
Date Filed: Sept. 21, 2015
Date Terminated: May 25, 2017
Date of Last Known Filing: Dec. 21, 2023
Cause: 28:1332ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
Nature of Suit: 320 Assault Libel & Slander
Jury Demand: Both
Jurisdiction Type: Diversity
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/giuffre-v-maxwell/
Reposted Giuffre v. Maxwell just above:
Sometimes simpler just to recopy the best stuff that didn't make it into notables.
o7