No Doe #107, Still Waiting on the List Edition

BREAKING: QR Headline More Informative Than Any MSM Article or Influencer Tweet

>>20174225

Thanks. Where is the elegant, verbose proof display, result of a process matured smooth by years of weathering, accounting for all learning types, but catering to the most discerning? Or just appeals to authority / delegation of discernment all the way down?

>>20174273

Thank you.

2024: Shareable collaborative open source webtool for creating said proofs, with linkshare. Cross between archive.to, cryptpad.fr, and the old muckety

Hovering over each link between two elements shows an explanation of what the relevance of said link is purported to be

Each connection can be given a user generated type so that other connections of that type can be cross referenced

Proof generators can use blockchain to prove identity as they publish new proofs

Browsers can choose to have results weighted to favor proof generators they trust / filter spammers

Knobs and levers to fine tune user side filters

Go forth, geniuses

>>20174309

Thank you. Last requirement, prove that DJT's Truth posts aren't auto-posted here by a 3rd party automated service / bot within one minute's time. (If I'm understanding correctly that '0' delta is granular to one minute scale)

>>20174225

>>20174254

>>20174273

>>20174288

>>20174311

>>20174309

>>20164701 (pb)

>>20174318

>>20174343

Excellent explain Anon. Only preknowledge of the content of DJT's Truth post could reasonably result in so many correlative characteristics between the two posts. Hence, the only parties that could be responsible for the second post would be:

• The person in charge of DJT's Truth account.

• A person privy to the drafts on DJT's Truth account (requires a draft to exist long enough before posted to coordinate a plausible proof)

• A person privy to a DJT' Truth post while in progress (requires seemingly impossible coordination / creativity / planning within a short timeframe - assuming it takes a few minutes to put together the post)

• An AI privy to DJT's Truth post in progress given instruction to create an on-the-fly proofable and post it to 8kun ( requires DJT's Truth posting OPSEC to have remote vulnerability, or for AI to be an allowed ally)

Any option other than Trump ally would be met with some denial / clarification that OPSEC has been compromised (?) and the two posts have no correlation - to avoid adverse future usage of the masquerading tripcode.

Lack of such denial would seem to result in a proof beyond reasonable doubt.

Inclusion of 'v2' would seem tacit endorsement of what might widely be considered existing canon.