>>20175294

>Mayorkas was born in Havana, Cuba.

>Yep, couldn't see that one coming.

>Totally a surprise.

Yeah, you forgot a couple of things there, Anon.

His father, Charles R. "Nicky" Mayorkas, was born in Cuba. He was a Cuban Jew of Sephardi (from the former Ottoman Empire, present-day Turkey and Greece) and Ashkenazi (from Poland) background. He owned and operated a steel wool factory on the outskirts of Havana.[14][16][17][18] Nicky Mayorkas studied economics at Dartmouth College.[18]

His mother, Anita (Gabor),[18] was a Romanian Jew whose family escaped the Holocaust and fled to Cuba in the 1940s[19][20][21] before leaving to the United States after the Cuban Revolution.[19]

It should be no surprise why Mayorkas was "selected" for his position, just like Merrick Garfinkel.

>>20175702

Pritzker. He's Jewish. If he lost, he'd just say the ruling was "antisemitic" and demand he be crowned the winner, by invoking the Holocaust.

>>20175715

>You can sword fight with them, homo.

Kek. Where's Dildo Sword Anon when you need him.

>>20175819

It's the Five of Cups, Anon. That's the Rider-Waite Deck. Most "common" of the Tarot decks.

Upright, it means failure, loss, regret. Here's a summary of the card, itself.

https://biddytarot.com/tarot-card-meanings/minor-arcana/suit-of-cups/five-of-cups/

Keep in mind, typically a reader shuffle the deck first, to clear the cards and then give the person who asked the question the deck, having them shuffle the deck, while thinking on the question they want an answer to, to infuse the deck with their own energy.

This is comms, for sure. I'm sure she set up the deck, before hand so she could get the "reading" she wanted.

>>20176050

>according to the jews here, he's everything except jewish actually

Yeah, I'm well aware of the fact that QR, like everywhere else on the interwebz controlled by the "Deep State" (tm), forbids the mentioning of the fact a person is Jewish, no matter how minute or remote it may be.

>>20176060

>Trump is the Grim reaper coming for Fox.

Quite possibly. Waters' question was rather specific. The better question to ask if if Waters is a "white hat" or a "black hat." Those two causalities change the question, entirely.

>>20176073

Kek

>>20176107

>Strange that you don't actually see the card being 'randomly' from the pack.

Exactly. They weren't shuffled as well. Any experienced reader will be shuffling the deck, while prepping a person to as a question. And you don't ask multiple questions without shuffling the deck, per question. Everything this woman did as a "reader" was inaccurate.

>>20176117 (me)

*to ask a question