>>20174225 (lb)
>>20174254 (lb)
>>20174273 (lb)
>>20174288 (lb)
>>20174311 (lb)
>>20174309 (lb)
>>20164701 (lb)
>>20174318 (lb)
>>20174343 (lb)
>>20174982 (lb)
Excellent explain Anon. Only preknowledge of the content of DJT's Truth post could reasonably result in so many correlative characteristics between the two posts. Hence, the only parties that could be responsible for the second post would be:
-
The person in charge of DJT's Truth account.
-
A person privy to the drafts on DJT's Truth account (requires a draft to exist long enough before posted to coordinate a plausible proof)
-
A person privy to a DJT' Truth post while in progress (requires seemingly impossible coordination / creativity / planning within a short timeframe - assuming it takes a few minutes to put together the post)
-
An AI privy to DJT's Truth post in progress given instruction to create an on-the-fly proofable and post it to 8kun ( requires DJT's Truth posting OPSEC to have remote vulnerability, or for AI to be an allowed ally)
Any option other than Trump ally would be met with some denial / clarification that OPSEC has been compromised (?) and the two posts have no correlation - to avoid adverse future usage of the masquerading tripcode.
Lack of such denial would seem to result in a proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Inclusion of 'v2' would seem tacit endorsement of what might widely be considered existing canon.