Anonymous ID: ce719e Jan. 4, 2024, 6:22 a.m. No.20181134   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1140

>>20181129

it accuses me of having rules, when it's society that has rule.

Abusers are called out.

sauceless malarkey is called out.

but this one doesn't want rules it just wants to lash out at anyone who points out that it's a serial liar and socially abusive.

Anonymous ID: ce719e Jan. 4, 2024, 6:28 a.m. No.20181165   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1176

>>20181157

I met a guy at the pickers place and his deal is he tries to find Disney product that has creepy stuff that is often on first edition so he has the version where the stuff is that gets removed once it gets pointed out, things that look like body parts, etc. He'll buy it and flip it. He says he makes a lot and that the stuff is very valuable.

Anonymous ID: ce719e Jan. 4, 2024, 6:35 a.m. No.20181206   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20181176

are you doing this to your album collection too? all you old TV shows?

if you destroy it all there is no record of the creepy brainwashing that went on.

Porn, for example, belongs in the hopper.

 

but a project like a movie, that wasn't supposed to be used to groom and had hundreds and hundreds of people working on it, may have a lot of good parts, and very interesting and educational material in it.

I agree there are some shows and movies that children ought never be shown anymore now that we understand what went in it, but I don't throw away a Sit Comm full series just because in the final seasons they put the cringe writers on it sothat there are five minute segments that need to be fast-forwarded through.

the writing is a collaboration, and the show is a troope, so if one person is considered repulsive (can you say 'That Seventies Show' ) do you throw away the whole series?

 

in the case of That SEventies Show they don't seem to have anyone buying their Blue Ray sets so they discount it steeply.

 

I didn't by That Seventies Show steeply discounted Blue Ray set even though I used to watch it and wouldn't mind reviewing it.

so it's a complicated equation.

Anonymous ID: ce719e Jan. 4, 2024, 6:43 a.m. No.20181257   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20181204

'most Christians'?

so Greeks don't read scripture in Greek?

commentaries from 1800 years ago are still available.

you didn't really study this before you started blatting out about it, did you?

Anonymous ID: ce719e Jan. 4, 2024, 6:51 a.m. No.20181299   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1315

>>20181279

use of 'you people' shows someone with a cultish view of others. there is him and his 'right think' and then 'you people'.

common amoung cultish ethnic groups who do the 'of-color' grift. or those raised in elite wealth pretending to be 'of the people' who don't get access to the money till they reach the age where welfare is no longer available to them (the grandfather, a miser, lets the parents get full-boat welfare and gives them cash so as to augment and not report that these are rich children born in it).

the 'you people' phrase is a linguistic tell for a clueless and jaded operator who might be convinced as to their born-in-it privledge, and sometimes that type is able to see how fortunate-son they really are.

but usually they can become supreme bullies who make up stuff about others that isn't true and use it to justify their dehumanization and mean behavior towards someone who merely wants to challange their false assumptions.

 

'you people' : a tell for a jaded hypocrite born in it

Anonymous ID: ce719e Jan. 4, 2024, 7:01 a.m. No.20181340   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1358

>>20181328

when I have no clue what someone is on about, due to a typo, sometimes I post as if I understand it in a way that obviously it's not like that just to get a repsonse and see if anyone real is there.

you do a 'running with scissors' response and that's just a surreal as 'fame whore Vermont'

Maybe the other poster will clarify what he meant.

 

PS: scissors don't have legs and no shoes either.

so they don't have red leather shoes. that's me being surreal and nonsequtor.

have a great day!

Anonymous ID: ce719e Jan. 4, 2024, 7:03 a.m. No.20181346   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1363 >>1367 >>1395 >>1441

>>20181341

if you knew Pig when Pig first started, and understood what the person was doing, maybe you'd be OK with Pig too.

the thing is that Pig is a guy who comments almost like the "mystery science theatre" silhouettes at the bottom of the screen.

If you don't get Pig, fine. But why spend so much effort trashing him?

Anonymous ID: ce719e Jan. 4, 2024, 7:08 a.m. No.20181377   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1401 >>1406

>>20181362

obviously he's not on the list so why are you doing this and perhaps making him consider actions against the board?

 

fortunatly your post is your post and the board is immune from your accusations which seem to be slander.

There is a lot that can be said about the guy, he's got a lot of material that can be worked through and he can be shown to be ridiculous rather easily.

so why not work on real material and do an expose on him? why waste your time with an obvious bogus and false accusation?

 

I know, you like getting under his skin. His reaction of being so upset gives you glee.

instead of imagining him as being aware enough to repent and reform you antagonize him.

Anonymous ID: ce719e Jan. 4, 2024, 7:11 a.m. No.20181390   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>20181367

some is, some isn't.

there is a tell that makes it far more likely that it is.

what is really kind of cool about the real Pig, if you come up with a file name from a posting of Pigs from years back Pig is able to produce that file in an instant.

So there is a real Pig, he has all his old files, and I disagree that all the Mr. Pig here now is not the original.

a lot of it isn't. But Mr. Pig is recognizable for a lot of reasons.

for me there is a kindness about the real one that makes it obvious. When there is an unkindness in a Mr. Pig post usually I can tell it's not him.

 

America Winning

Anonymous ID: ce719e Jan. 4, 2024, 7:18 a.m. No.20181424   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1464

>>20181395

Pig is Pig

an anon made a meme.

no one knows who the anon is.

so it's not a famefag.

it's like 'banksie' for a meme character.

 

do you know who Banksie is?

no one does.

no one knows who Mr. Pig's author is either.

 

so no, it's not a name fag it's an anon's meme through which he comments on the other posts on the board.

 

Now, for example, Anjel G, who showed up on a specific date, had been an anon. and then on St. Patricks day he did a naked bake and posted himself (waste up) on the Internet, looking high as a kite and being a goof roid-head (he is in love with himself).

now he is a name fag.

and why is that bad? Because he got death threats and had to deal with the fact that people were very very mean to him (some people).

 

so the reason that it's bad to be a name fag is that you then become a target.

 

no one knows anything bout the anon who posts Mr. Pig so how is he a name or fame fag? He's not. Mr. Pig is his meme.

others imitate it.

others spend far too much time trashing it.

Anonymous ID: ce719e Jan. 4, 2024, 7:28 a.m. No.20181489   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1500

>>20181473

I think that respecting graves and Necropolli is a thing that people do no matter what their culture when they are of an adult mindset.

the idea of the dead and respecting them is something that is a world wide human priority.

 

so, yes, a lot of the people who don't speak English understand that.