>>20188310 (pb)
; )
I'm glad about that!
but no more live
"Rage Against the Machine"
https://www.sfgate.com/sf-culture/article/rage-against-the-machine-breakup-no-live-shows-18590193.php
isn't it curious that there is no way to know his nationality?
he looks like a Euromarxist to me.
sauce on Adam being on Epstein's Island please
https://www.bostonherald.com/2024/01/04/ma-overtime-bill-in-fantasy-world-with-100k-earners-up-25/
massachusetts overtime gets some people the big cha-ching.
the server for the images 'saves' the image.
when I filter and ad block the image the post shows up with the image already ad-blocked. So that means that they don't remove it from the image server either!
imagine that.
now usually I've ad blocked it fairly recently so . . .
that means that when they remove the post they do nothing with the image.
using an autocorrelation function they ought to be able to do image match and write an algorithm that would just not allow a post that repeats that image but . . .
instead we see the same child in the abusive pose for weeks and weeks.
clearly it's here for some purpose. It's not 'technically' CP, though it supposedly links to it.
I'm pretty sick of seeing it over and over and they can figure out a way where they could block it as a repeat but they don't.
as much as I loath this guy you are just making up stuff about him without sauce.
He never said this.
there is plenty about him to discuss that shows him to be a self-entitled jerk who has only his own interests at heart.
you don't need to make up lies about him.
I lived with some kids who were rich-kids on the daddy-dime and they
never did the dishes
so what the rest of us would do is
wash the dishes before the meal and then
after the meal was over just leave them dirty in the sink.
they got the message.
people know the consequences of saying what you say and thus never say it, even if they think it's true, which it isn't.
they are not 'all' that.
don't you think you're being rediculous?
you made up that accronym.
there is enought about her that is off where she doesn't deserve the nomination.
you don't need to make up stuff like this.
'folks' is a perfectly good word.
I did a very close inspection and have considered the ghosting around the hair of the boy and the ghosting around the hair of Donald Trump and I don't think that this is a real photograph, but a composite.
also the large shadow behind Epstein's head is not consistent, if it were a flash why would there be such a shadow?
images included show strange indications of it being a composite, using the original and modified with color curves one can see that this looks like it's been doctored
using color curves on it makes it show curious aspects of it that look like someone smuging with a mouse. I don't believe it is authentic based upon that unless there are others in a stream and those show the same kind of effect.
Seems very fake to me.
the little face like smuging behind Epsteins head sure makes it look like a doctored image to me!
'your creator' not 'our creator' marks this person as a manipulative larper
you hating him and being so over the top in needing to be his tormentor and accuser kind of proves his authenticity.
listen to the accuser.
nothing that other one said was cowardly and nothing I said was either.
you don't show the love that means that you get-it and that's why I say you 'hate' him.
what is your purpose in being his accuser? what does it do for you?
he believes and you can't have that, so you spew insults and try to make him seem to be as you paint him up to be.
I'm not hiding, I'm being direct.
you being an accuser and acting like you hate him for his beliefs is to be expected.
you need to lighten up and just be happy for him to have found a real purpose.
you seem to have the purpose only to be a constant accuser and poison skeptic who can never say 'that's fair' or "I understand" but must always inject your reasons why everyone else is false, when they aren't.
lighten up and show the love and maybe you won't be so bitter and quick to condemn others for merely expressing their beliefs.
; >