>>20201317 lb
You will not redefine your censorship as the opposite of compelled listening. Everyone here has access to the same filter button as you. If something is repeated it is spam, if illegal, requires removal. If you don't like it, look away. I am not a Jew-hater, I am a free-speech lover.
Legit telling me freedom of speech is compelled listening. Commies gonna commie.
That was not a rebuttal.
I don't post that shit. My shit doesn't get censored. But you can't understand why I would defend offensive speech as free speech because you don't believe the people can decide for themselves what to agree with. You think you know better than us. You seek to control what people see, then claim they can rebut the censored posts? That is illogical. When people discuss an ethnicity as all bad, they are saying kill those babies. That ideology should be rebutted with reason. If you organize the censorship of their free speech against the jews as the guilty party seeking to control them, you are actually proving what they say. That Jews are control freaks who should have no power over others, like any other manifestation of tyranny, and should be spoken out against, judged, and condemned. But "Jew" is a religion. And religions are ideas. And some ideas are better than others. The idea that we cannot criticize a religion here is the antithesis of what we do. This censorship you champion equates to removal of posts about satanism, child molestation, treason, and many other evils that can and do use religions as a vehicle for their treachery.
Are you the bible police? Maybe you should arrest them.
Isn't it anti-semitic to think only non-Jews care about censoring the trash-talking of Jews.
I don't know who that is. I don't keep track of your crew's named individuals.
Please, feel free to use additional words to explain why we shouldn't have free speech.
Justification was not required as the notabled post did not come with any information proving its assertions. The absolute state of this fucking place.
Not allowed.