I still don't understand WHY did the DOJ have to include a passage that directly contradicts Q.

What's the point of that?

This is the first time I'm having doubts about all this, time keeps passing by, but all the old players still seem to be running wild and free regardless of sealed indictments and people resigning in the background.

I have a bad feeling that we're not going to see any revelations, that people resigning are being accused of petty things like using job-issued credit cards for personal expenses while the real crimes are being hushed away and hidden from public view.

If this is winning I'd hate to see what losing looks like.

https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/07/03/imran-awan-plea-deal-doj/

>>2020758

Agreed, military tribunals would be the only option left that would make sense.

However, the odds of military tribunals happening are VERY low historically speaking (would it be the first time in the history of the country?) - and that's what makes me worried.

>>2020940

It most probably is, but it doesn't mean anything good.

>>2021042

Doesn't sound like a proof of anything to me :)

Just a good photoshop "for a message"

>>2021228

They're not losers yet. None of them got anything bigger than a slap on the wrist.

>>2021285

I'd love to be proven wrong, I'll eat my own shit with pleasure.