Anonymous ID: 55c315 Jan. 8, 2024, 12:54 a.m. No.20205246   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>20205235

>But isn't a $370m 'fine' applied when no one had a problem a bit "excessive"?

Of course it is, that's the point.

Same with the judgement against Giuliani.

Mob tactics to scare off potential allies.

Unfortunately, those tactics backfire as cowards back away from Trump, and he's surrounded by true warriors who don't give AF.

Anonymous ID: 55c315 Jan. 8, 2024, 2:57 a.m. No.20205382   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>20205374

>"We have historical examples of periods where the central bank monetary anchor was not thereโ€ฆ That certainly was the case at the time of the free banking in the 19th century. Do we want to go back to those days? Probably not. I would say certainly not from our vantage point."

Is referring to Constitutional silver/gold Dollars.