don't you mean civil rights abuse in the case the protestors blocking highways and throughways?
It's the not? in what sense?
clearly some of them run sexual blackmail rings and due to that others of them get jobs that they really aren't qualified for and others are let to be the overlords of captive nations.
right to travel, right to go about your way.
blocking a highway is abusive and it's a civil rights abuse.
who are you? one of the tag-team shills?
making up stuff about people and being terse and abusive?
you do your thing, I'll do mine.
incorrect.
it's 'NGO's' who, because of the cabal are a kind of governance. It's organizations funded by the cabal and other grifts.
they are political and they have an agenda.
they are organized and they have mailing lists.
they are often staffed by people who also run welfare and pay people to be involved.
in any case if you are preventing people's free travel, to and from stores, hospitals, and work, you are VIOLATING them
and that is a violation of their civil rights.
the fact that you get away with it, or have, doesn't take away from the fact of it being abusive. It's abusive and it's civil rights abuse.
the people who do it are criminals, and thye aren't protesting, they are doing an insurrection.
Q never said to go into the capitol building. Q was pretty much done when the building exploded in Nashville.
and PS: PJT told eveyrone to go home but the social media wouldn't let him post it.
it was a set up, an inside job, and the MAGA who did go into the building had NO IDEA that there was violence going on in the inner corridors.
they walked through the capitol rotunda like blissful tourists and NONE OF THEM should be in jail or be persecuted for going into a building that was illegally closed due to a fake pandemic.
It's the people's building so how could they have been tresspassing?
>6863ae
you support civil rights abuse, anon.
shutting down roads is civil rights abuse.
people have a right to free commerce. It's written in the Constitution.
shutting down roads prohibits that and violates their civil rights.
you support it and thus you too are a civil rights abuser.
why are you on Q's board then.
you ought to just leave if you don't follow Q.
this is Q Research.
it's very poor taste to give someone grief for talking about Q here.
no, anon, you have the idea of being abusive as part of your 'protestor persona'.
you live it and breath it.
look how hard you defend it.
just admit that you support abusive protests and repent and reform.
in the long run you'll feel better about yourself.
once again: blocking highways and roads, without a permit, is illegal. Those who do it are abusing the civil rights of those who want to use those roads.
why is that so hard to understand?
PS: your attack of saying that I don't have courage further shows you as being the puke leftwing coward persona.
you have a self-rightous attitude and do not know the law.
When Chris Christi let his minions block highways for political payback, that too, was abusive.
and he paid a very high political price for it.
I hated it when he did it and I hate it when marxists do it.
there is nothing brave about blocking people in the public way, nothing couragous. In fact it's a hostle act, abusive, and almost a kind of assault.
you have no idea what I've done or what I've protested. you're just making stuff up.
and wondering off into topics that you get from a list.
it's disrespectful what you do.
you are an obvious political operator and apologist for civil rights abusers.
and the sad part is you don't even see it, or if you do see it you won't admit it.
when you realize that I am correct and blocking highways is wrong and abusive, I hope you repent and reform.