dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

“The Liberal Catholics of our country are now making another concession to Interfaith charity and Brotherhood benevolence. They are saying, "It was not the Jews who crucified Christ; it was the Romans."

I should like to ask these Liberal Catholics a few pointed questions on the subject of Our Lord's death.

Was it the Romans who came out to seize Him in the Garden of Olives with swords and clubs on the night of His Passion, and who brought Him bound to the High Priest, and then to Pontius Pilate, demanding that He should be killed?

Was it a Roman who betrayed Jesus with a kiss, and was it to Romans He was sold for thirty pieces of silver?

Was the High Priest a Roman, who rent his garments and accused Our Lord of blasphemy when He declared Himself to be the Eternal Son of God?

Was it a Roman crowd which stood before the tribunal of Pontius Pilate and shouted: "If this man were not a malefactor we would not have handed Him over to you … His blood be upon us and upon our children!"

Was it the Romans who disowned Jesus as the King of the Jews, and did not want the inscription placed over His head on the Cross when He hung, crowned with thorns, and with nails in His hands and His feet?

Was it God's judgement in Heaven that the Romans had killed Christ, and was that why the Power of the Almighty some thirty years later razed the Temple of Jerusalem to the ground, and left not one stone upon a stone, and has never allowed it to be rebuilt from that day to this?

In the prayers of the Mass for Good Friday of Holy Week, the priest refers to the "perfidious Jews" as the ones who betrayed and crucified Christ. Should he be saying the "perfidious Romans"? And has it been wrong for the Church to put it the first way for as long as her history?

When Our Lord hung upon the Cross, His first recorded words were, "Father forgive them for they know not what they do."

Do the Liberal Catholics really think Our Lord was referring to the Jews when He said, "They know not what they do"? Was it the Jewish Chief Priests, the Scribes, and the Ancients, with whom He sat daily teaching in the Temple and who, when He was crucified, wagged their heads and mocked Him and shouted: "He saved others; himself He cannot save" – was it these who knew not what they did, and whom Our Lord asked the Father to forgive?

Saint Luke tells us clearly that Jesus said this of the Roman soldiers who "dividing his garments, cast lots." And Saint Matthew tells us that these same Romans, after Jesus expired on the Cross, cried out in one voice with their Centurion, "Indeed, this was the Son of God!".”

–

Try harder.

Anonymous ID: 254f54 July 3, 2018, 8:17 p.m. No.2021559 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>1578

>>2021487

Yep.

PUT THE ARCHIVE LINK ON YOUR PICS ANON, ITS GOOD FORM.

Anonymous ID: 254f54 July 3, 2018, 8:21 p.m. No.2021636 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>1975

>>2021508

>Did you know that Jews actually do believe that a messiah (christ) exists, but it is not Jesus?

Yep, jews rejected Jesus because he said his message was for all the sons of God, all of humanity, and jews being in-group racists they rejected him as their messiah.

>Did you know that the term chosen people does not mean that they are superior to others? It means that they were chosen to spread the word outside the community?

That was what it was supposed to mean, but the way jews tend to take it is that they are better than everyone else.

This is well documented.

Once again, read this:

“When Victims Rule: A Critique of Jewish Pre-eminence in America”

Has anyone read this masterpiece?

This is a 2000 page book written by an anon over 18 years ago, featuring over 10,000 citations from about 4,000 (scholarly and mainstream media) bibliographic sources.

http://holywar.org/jewishtr/wvr.htm

http://archive.is/uHFnj

It starts at the origin of jews and covers all of that.