>>20212733

Israeli 'youth' from Israel at a center in Brooklyn digging tunnels without at the elders of the center knowing of it, and having people down in them that they didn't tell the elders about, and a matress with a curious stain at where a head would be (like somoene used it to dispatch of a victim) and a riot and tunnels that make the other buildings around them unsafe is 'bait' to distract us from things?

so what is important to discuss?

the people in the tunnel were arrested and brought out.

this was after there was a truck called to fill it up with cement (and that would have probably been a very bad thing to do because all the people may have thus been trapped down inside).

so it's a conflict at a center between the people who run it and people who showed up (from Israel) recently (why aren't they in the IMF if they are Israeli , and deployed?)

so there are all kinds of questions and it speaks to : there is not unity between these folks. They are not all 'on the same page'.

some of them seem to think that they are living a holy lifestyle while others of them seem to be taking advantage of the navitee.

and so some of them might be criminals taking advantage of others and

that doesn't matter to you?

of course it's important to not let it be a blanket condemnation of all of that group (that particular group), but seriously, you'd have peopel not be interested? not know about this?

how many other centers of a similar nature are also compromised by johnny-come-lately (probably spies) from Israel?

and given that Mossad has been shown to be in leauge of Epstein recently, and he also used tunnels . . .

you don't see any reason to continue with this?

if only to understand it, if only to absolve the guy who called for the cement truck from the charges of attempted mass murder of the people in the tunnel . . .

but no, it's about a group that you want to 'protect' and your ham-brained point of view actually makes it worse for them, by covering it up you make it seem as though they ought to be allowed to get away with such behavior.

no, anon, the dig on this is important and as a person worried about public opinion you should be supporting it and trying to explain it so that it doesn't seem like the worst possible thing, as you clearly don't want.

I'd like to know the truth.

but with you here saying oh, no, don't even look at this doesn't it seem like you'd like to just cover up the whole issue and metaphorically pour a truck load of cement over the whole issue.

no elder is going to bury people in a tunnel. He must not have known that they were in there.

>>20212980

so you're claiming that the one's calling in the cement truck wanted to perform mass murder?

wow.

you have a very low opinion of people.

'papers in order?' is that a veiled threat.

you and your slander. You're always here.

anyone sane you act like they are some kind of operator.

anyone telling you that you're off base, you make veiled threats.

you accuse people of stuff and do your 'dominance' bit but ulitmately you come off as irrational, off-base, and totally wrong about pretty-much everything you comment on.

>>20213013

shut up, slander shill.

you know nothing of me.

>>20213027

how many of them are Republicans?

>>20213041

you know nothing.

>>20213059

"I know who you are, I saw what you did"

>>20213089

my suggestion for the runners of this bot that you ought to stop running it.

It's rather obvious as a bot and it has little or no purpose as anon are seasoned and aware of what it is.

it tags someone and it badgers them through the bread.

it may in fact be handled by a real person, but if so it' plays the 'badgering moron' role: it never conceeds that the slanders of falsehoods that it is 'sure of' (stuff like "I know you're a . . . . . and that's all that matters" ) is total BS.

and when you use such a bot and do such stupid statments, you lose the argument because the person who you slander or say false things about (because saying I'm a Jew isn't really slander, because there are very good Jews and some of them are holy and awesome) them . . the person knows who they are and what their faith is and that the bot (or persona) is just making it up.

so running this kind of a bot or operation (of gaslighting) is just a 'fail' for you and your team.

anon don't want to slander people, nor do they want to misrepresent them.

anon want Justice and and end of human trafficking.

the bot that attacks and slanders or misrepresents and makes bold and false statements about which it has no way to know is a waste of our time.

and as far as it goes, all it does is make it all the more important that the real information gets out.

>>20213103

The tunnel is not a coordinated slide.

It's an important news story.

there are those who want to bury it by saying stupid things without evidence.

and then you post someone with the pointing 'this' meme (a confirmation shill)

when you don't like the news you say it's a slide? that makes you the shill.

>>20213174

when Jesus says 'Jews' he isn't saying 'all Jews'

read it more like 'those Jews'

some of the people who were running things in Jesus's day weren't really following the law.

not all, some.

why cna't you understand that there was no 'all' there?

Jesus spoke first to the Jews. He was there for them.

because he loved them.

but you read it as 'all Jews' when it was just some of them.

very many Jews heard Jesus and said 'huh, ya, he IS the messiah!'

>>20213104

wow.

that won't play well in New Hampshire either.

you don't leave people to walk off into the blizzard if they were riding with you in the car.

>>20213352

Many who today say that the are Jews havn't heard the real story of Jesus.

they are not 'Synagogue of Satan' anon.

and, in fact, Christians understand that it's not just Christians who go to Heaven.

"I have other folds"

>>20213370

are you talking to yourself?

>>20213376

not on a team.

not part of a group.

you are the one trying to diminish a news story.

filtered.

>>20213365

what we do know is that the shills here want this story to go away.

they keep attacking anyone discussing it rationally.

>>20213402

stranding someone in a blizzard to walk far to find shelter might be called manslaughter if they end up frozen to death.

>>20213419

if you see someone walking on a blizzardly highway you might also have an obligation to ask them if they need assitence, or at least direct the local authorities to go and check out the straggler alone in the rain-and-snow.

>>20213422

again, are you talking to yourself?

you have no idea about me so you just make stuff up.

>>20213438

people help other people.

when you live in a climate where it's possible to freeze to death if you don't get shelter there are obligations that apply to strangers and stragglers, anon.

Rain and Snow

No Speed Limit

>>20213466

there are obligations, anon, to help those in distress.

not all follow them, that's true.

but a presidential candidate and her team

sure should.