was listening to Jim Rickards on Bannon's podcast.

a few notable things:

Jim mentioned that he war-gamed financial warfare for C_A.

He mentioned that it was obvious that people front-ran 9/11 and the C_A wanted to know if they could develop a system to alert for other events based on funky stock trades. Jim's answer was "yes."

What pissed anon off, and still does, is how flippant Jim was about the fact that everyone involved knew/knows there are people out there who front-ran 9/11. Jim even said "and I know who they are." His excuse as to why the C_A wasn't interested in pursuing those folks - they aren't law enforcement. Other agencies (DOJ, FBI) are tasked with that.

Jim, for God sakes man, spill the beans. Who the fuck front-ran 9/11? Whistleblow, douchebag. Or at least have the decency not to brag about figuring out who front-ran 9/11 without telling America who it was.

Bannon - what the fuck?

>>20216659

this anon thinks we lost the Republic when JFK was shot. 9/11 was the day we lost the empire.

we won't have a Republic until those responsible for both of those events are brought out into the light and to justice. can't happen. a Republic assumes that the elected represent their constituents and act in the common good.

it is safe to say that most constituents will always want the truth of those two incidents brought to light, and that bringing those responsible to justice is the common good. litmus test on whether we have a Republic or not.

>>20216286

sauce that shit. anon doesn't recall flynn on that board.

anon does remember kissinger