Corrupted bibles
All pb
>>20217624. Someone fucked with it
They added ball
Job 26:7
He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing.
Gross they added ball
earth is hung like a ball in the air upon nothing; and yet its foundations are such as that it shall not be removed; being the purpose and decree, the power and might, of the Lord himself, ( Job 26:7 ) (
Circle or shere
Still not a ball
Pillars on a ball?
Ok that is so obvious
And a plumbline is for flat serfaces and compass the earth.
Not on a ball
I see you fear death.
Believe lie that you do't die, you will die.
And probably the second deat also. >>20217680
Your spirit lives forever, yes. But your body will die. Then judgement DAY all will bend knee before Jesus, some will live eternally with Jesus, most will suffer second death and be cast away firever.
That is the God I believe.
You do you and hope for yor self created idoltry of some other god.
My belief is in The ONE true living God of most holy bible.
You can belive what you choose.
We will all be there one judgement day. Everyone
I lookforwardto leaving this corrupted body. Nofearofdeath.. yougo to sleep until he comes for us.
Then judgemnt DAY
Not on a ball.
How is heaven above if you on bottom of ball world
No.
He created us to choose HIM.
We get 120 hears to choose.
I chose already.
So no fear of death whatsoever.
Ready anytime.
So do tell your entire point of creation.
It was coruted when Adam partook of eating with Eve. Current world is not as intnded at all. We are in a fallen world.
I want the new one as promised.
I beleive what HE tells me.
>So do tell your entire point of creation
You are choosing faksehoods
Some will be dead wrong.
>>20217719 you get to decide, but don't take my word fir it
Hard to accomplish on a ball:
11:12): “And gather the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth
… four angels standing on the four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on …
Rev.7 - Bible, King James Version
Not snark. I read my bible.
You say high horse.
Just warning to heed.
You have free will to choose to believe what HE says or not.
I'm with HIM, even if it is just me who believes.
Never indoctrinated. Never church.
Beliver at age 32. No o e i knew was a Christian.
Had real encounter, experience that changed my sight.
Hebrews 3:7-4:11
Lexham English Bible
A Serious Warning Against Unbelief
7 Therefore, just as the Holy Spirit says,
“Today, if you hear his voice,
8 do not harden your hearts as in the rebellion,
in the day of testing in the wilderness,
9 where your fathers tested me by trial
and saw my works 10 for forty years.
Therefore I was angry with this generation,
and I said, ‘They always go astray in their heart,
and they do not know my ways.’
11 As I swore in my anger,
‘They will never enter[a] into my rest.’”[b]
12 Watch out, brothers, lest there be in some of you an evil, unbelieving heart, with the result that you fall away[c] from the living God. 13 But encourage one another day by day[d], as long as it is called “today,” so that none of you become hardened[e] by the deception of sin. 14 For we have become partners of Christ, if indeed we hold fast the beginning of our commitment steadfast until the end, 15 while it is said[f],
“Today, if you hear his voice,
do not harden your hearts as in the rebellion.”[g]
16 For who, when they[h] heard it, were disobedient? Surely it was not all who went out from Egypt through Moses? 17 And with whom was he angry for forty years? Was it not with those who sinned, whose dead bodies fell in the wilderness? 18 And to whom did he swear they would not enter into his rest, except those who were disobedient? 19 And so we see that they were not able to enter because of unbelief.
The Rest that Remains for the People of God
4 Therefore let us fear, while there[i] remains a promise of entering into his rest, that none of you appear to fall short of it. 2 For we also have had the good news proclaimed to us[j], just as those also did, but the message they heard[k] did not benefit them, because they[l] were not united with those who heard it in faith. 3 For we who have believed enter into rest,[m] just as he has said,
“As I swore in my anger,
‘They will never enter[n] into my rest.’”[o]
And yet these works have been accomplished from the foundation of the world. 4 For he has spoken somewhere about the seventh day in this way: “And God rested on the seventh day from all his works,”[p] 5 and in this passage again, ‘They will never enter[q] into my rest.’”[r] 6 Since therefore it remains for some to enter into it, and the ones to whom the good news was proclaimed previously did not enter because of disobedience, 7 again he ordains a certain day, today, speaking by David after so long a time, just as had been said before,
“Today, if you hear his voice,
do not harden your hearts.”[s]
8 For if Joshua had caused them to rest, he would not have spoken about another day after these things. 9 Consequently a sabbath rest remains for the people of God. 10 For the one who has entered into his rest has also himself rested from his works, just as God did from his own works.
11 Therefore, let us make every effort to enter into that rest, in order that no one may fall in the same pattern of disobedience.
Read about what soil you may be:
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2013&version=AMPC;NKJV
Two moar?
https://twitter.com/OwenBenjamin/status/1744940184704319501
Owen Benjamin 🐻
@OwenBenjamin
I think the Jews in the sewer is a
Psy op to bury this
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/what-is-genocide-case-against-israel-top-un-court-2024-01-08/
From reuters.com
9:32 PM · Jan 9, 2024
What is the genocide case against Israel at top UN court?
By Stephanie van den Berg
January 9, 20244:24 AM MSTUpdated 20 hours ago
THE HAGUE, Jan 9 (Reuters) - The International Court of Justice will hold hearings this week on a case brought by South Africa accusing Israel of genocide in the Gaza war and seeking an emergency suspension of its military campaign.
WHAT IS THE ICJ?
The ICJ, also called the World Court, is the highest United Nations legal body, established in 1945 to deal with disputes between states. It should not be confused with the treaty-based International Criminal Court, also in The Hague, which handles war crimes cases against individuals.
The ICJ's 15-judge panel - which will be expanded by an additional judge from each side in the Israel case - deals with border disputes and increasingly cases brought by states accusing others of breaking U.N. treaty obligations.
Both South Africa and Israel are signatories to the 1948 Genocide Convention which gives the ICJ the jurisdiction to rule on disputes over the treaty. While the case revolves around the occupied Palestinian territories, Palestinians have no official role in the proceedings because they are not a United Nations member state.
All states that signed the Genocide Convention are obliged to not commit genocide and also to prevent and punish it. The treaty defines genocide as "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group".
WHAT IS SOUTH AFRICA'S CASE?
In its 84-page filing South Africa says that by killing Palestinians in Gaza, causing them serious mental and bodily harm and by creating conditions on life "calculated to bring about their physical destruction", Israel is committing genocide against them.
THE HAGUE, Jan 9 (Reuters) - The International Court of Justice will hold hearings this week on a case brought by South Africa accusing Israel of genocide in the Gaza war and seeking an emergency suspension of its military campaign.
WHAT IS THE ICJ?
The ICJ, also called the World Court, is the highest United Nations legal body, established in 1945 to deal with disputes between states. It should not be confused with the treaty-based International Criminal Court, also in The Hague, which handles war crimes cases against individuals.
The ICJ's 15-judge panel - which will be expanded by an additional judge from each side in the Israel case - deals with border disputes and increasingly cases brought by states accusing others of breaking U.N. treaty obligations.
Both South Africa and Israel are signatories to the 1948 Genocide Convention which gives the ICJ the jurisdiction to rule on disputes over the treaty. While the case revolves around the occupied Palestinian territories, Palestinians have no official role in the proceedings because they are not a United Nations member state.
All states that signed the Genocide Convention are obliged to not commit genocide and also to prevent and punish it. The treaty defines genocide as "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group".
Cont:
Cont:
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/what-is-genocide-case-against-israel-top-un-court-2024-01-08/
WHAT IS SOUTH AFRICA'S CASE?
In its 84-page filing South Africa says that by killing Palestinians in Gaza, causing them serious mental and bodily harm and by creating conditions on life "calculated to bring about their physical destruction", Israel is committing genocide against them.
It lists Israel's failure to provide essential food, water, medicine, fuel, shelter and other humanitarian assistance to the Gaza strip during the more than three-month-old war with Hamas. It also points to the sustained bombing campaign which has laid much of the enclave to waste, forced the evacuation of some 1.9 million Palestinians and killed over 23,000 people according to Gaza health authorities.
"The acts are all attributable to Israel, which has failed to prevent genocide and is committing genocide in manifest violation of the Genocide Convention," the filing says, adding that Israel also failed to curb incitement to genocide by its own officials in violation of the convention. It asks the court to impose emergency measures to cease alleged violations by Israel.
WHAT IS ISRAEL'S RESPONSE?
Israeli President Isaac Herzog called the ICJ case "atrocious and preposterous". Israel has said it makes utmost efforts to avoid civilian casualties in Gaza.
The Israeli offensive was triggered by the Oct. 7, 2023 cross-border Hamas attacks in which Islamist fighters killed 1,200 people and abducted 240, according to Iraeli figures.
We will be there at the International Court of Justice and will present proudly our case of using self-defence under our most inherent right under international humanitarian law," Herzog said.
WHAT WILL HAPPEN AT THE HEARINGS?
The hearings will take place on Jan 11 and 12. South Africa and Israel will both have two hours on separate days to make their case for or against emergency measures. There will be no witness testimony and no cross-examinations. The presentation will be mostly legal arguments brought by state officials and their teams of international lawyers.
The request for emergency measures is a first step in a case that will take several years to complete. Formally called provisional measures, they are meant as a kind of restraining order to prevent a dispute from getting worse while the court looks at the full case.
The court will not make a final determination on South Africa's genocide allegations until a hearing of the case on the merits, which is likely years away.
This week's hearings are only about possibly granting emergency measures. Judges at the ICJ often grant such measures, which generally consist of asking a state to refrain from any action that could aggravate the legal dispute.
For provisional measures the court only has to decide if at first glance, or prima facie, it would have jurisdiction and the acts complained of could fall within the scope of the genocide treaty. Any measures it decides would not necessarily be those requested by the complainant.
South Africa has asked the court to order Israel to suspend its military actions in Gaza, to stop any genocidal acts or take reasonable measures to prevent genocide and issue regular reports to the ICJ about such measures.
A decision on the measures is expected in the weeks following the hearings.
The ICJ's rulings are final and without appeal, but it has no way of enforcing them. A ruling against Israel could hurt the country's international reputation and set legal precedent.
HOW LONG WILL IT BE UNTIL A FINAL RULING ?
If the court finds it has prima facie jurisdiction, the case will move forward at the ornate Peace Palace in The Hague - even if the judges decide against emergency measures.
Israel would then get another chance to argue the court has no legal grounds to look at South Africa's claim and to file a so-called preliminary objection - which can only touch on issues of jurisdiction. If the court rejects that objection, the judges could finally look at the case in further public hearings.
It is not unusual for several years to pass between the initial claim and the actual hearing of the case on its merits.