Anonymous ID: 8aeb19 July 3, 2018, 9:02 p.m. No.2022310   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2334 >>2545 >>2660

>>2022196

 

>>2022231

Because the person who lined them up didn't perfectly match the rotation of the phone to transform the picture and line it up.

It's pretty fucking obvious that picture was used, look at the folds in the curtains, they are identical.

The only variation is the warp of the reflection itself.

You could get this iphone and take this picture at home.

 

Any sincere anon with half a brain knows this, and will also notice every person just responds "kys shill" without any real refutation to the clear match.

They might as well screech heretic, or racist.

Anonymous ID: 8aeb19 July 3, 2018, 9:22 p.m. No.2022757   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2821

>>2022440

>>2022452

Any one with a half-functioning brain can see that it is literally a picture of a reflection of a stock photo.

The curtain folds are identical, but the original photoshop didn't take a ton of time warping the pic to compensate for the warp of the iphone reflection to make the items near the lamp match perfectly.

It is the same photo..

That doesn't have to mean Q is a LARP, but presenting it as real, then when called out responding with using the misplacement of those said items in an almost non-sequitur replyโ€ฆ

Q supposedly wanted autists, who are the people who notice what I am saying, not sycophantic retards, the anons whose eyes glaze over and they scream SHILL at the site of any skepticism of any kind .

If we are going to swallow this type of shit without a big boy explanation, can you even call this a "research" board?