>>20225484 (lb)

>You're either a millennial or younger with a nose ring

Afraid not. I was born in 1971.

>or you're a follower of Islam.

Projection. I abhorALLthe Abrahamic Triumvirate. They've done nothing but spread devastation and destruction where ever they go. Centuries of infighting, 'cos their "God" told them they were "Chosen." Great way to rack up those blood sacrifices. Religion is just another form of control and another set of chains. No thank you.

>Your masters

And who exactly are my "Masters?" With that out of the way, who exactly areyours?

>threw you a bone to give your dying online narrative a bit of life to go a wee bit

Yeah, I'm not the one that made this atrocious video using children, but keep on with your projection. Kek. Or are you saying this video is "fake?"

>>20225522

I'm more irritated that Engoron refused to allow Trump to be with his wife, at her Mother's funeral. Shows a lack of humanity on his part and Judges should be in touch with their humanity, given their jobs. Engoron has no business being on a bench.

>>20225564

>We can call it JDS.

Indeed….

>>20225524

>I have better things to do than chase a distraction narrative with no details released than what was in the video.

Then stop bitching about other Anons doing digs for information. Speculation is an integral part to police investigations, Moran. It's called "probable cause" and it's the foundation ofANYinvestigation by law enforcement. Ask me how I know.

>>20225509

>it wasn't the deep state, it was the chabad kids.

>Sounds like a TV show 'The Chabad Kids'

Kekkity! You just made me laugh so hard, I farted.

>zanny, whacky, touchy, horny . . .

>>20225644

>You don't know shit.

Yeah… I was a cop for about 8 years, but I don't know "shit." Nice projection, though.

>>20225650

> I see a narrative trying to be constructed around that and trying to generate a consensus around it.

No, that's projection.

>So now you're the police?

I was at one point in time, yes. Left the Army in '92 and got my associates in CJ by '94. Was a cop from 94-2002.

>No, it's called presenting a guilty until proven innocent narrative, one that was posted here for years.

No, it's not. It's called investigating. No one has been charged for a crime. That takes time. If you don't have solid evidence for the Prosecution, the Defense will shred it to pieces. That's why Prosecutors want iron clad evidence when they file charges, genius.

>Because you're a paid posting clown?

Moar projection. Take the L, Son.

>>20225653

This dude is so fucking cringe….

>>20225687

>Second guess India.

Kek. "FUCK YOU BLODDY!"

>>20225770 (me)

Ooops. BLOODY.

>>20225753

>They slept and ate there because it was a secret operation.”

Why was it secret? These fucking morans are just making it worse for themselves. The more excuses and slides they pile on, the more their story becomes bullshit.

>>20225714

>I don't project, dipshit

> I'm not a clown, I'm not paid to post, I have no narrative, but you do.

That's literal projection, Moran.

>>20225815

>No, that's an admission. A factual statement

Kek. Quoth you, "I'm not a clown, I'm not paid to post, I have no narrative, but you do." Your "narrative" is to imply that I have one. Your whole "argument" about my trying to "generate consensus" about a narrative is your narrative to "generate consensus." That's projection, Anon.

>Just because that's what you do doesn't mean that everyone else here is.

Again, projection. You just started backpedaling when I mentioned I was former LEO. Kinda blew up your slide.

< Nice to see you've dropped the tunnel circle-jerk and are no focusing solely on me and trying to generate a circle-jerk from that.

More projection, but at least we know your primary focus is to keep people from investigating what was going on in those tunnels. You just outed yourself.

> Now that you've proven yourself to be just another clown

Pot meet kettle.

> I think I'll filter you now and put you where you belong.

Yawns. Couldn't win the debate, so you quit. How kosher of you.

>>20225816

>Y'gotta kek at how insanely fucked up this is.

Exactly. As I was pointing out to a tunnel-deflection shill, I am a former cop. My instincts from the skills I learned in law enforcement tells me there is more to this story, with all the slides and deflections, that this whole thing merits serious investigation.

And theyREALLYdon't want us talking about this, which makes it even more suspect.

>>20225855

>>20225854

>tippy fuckin top!

Indeed. And the majority of responses to me, concerning any of this is "paid shill," "could you glow more," "you're trying to generate consensus" when all I'm saying is, "This is bizarre and should be looked into."

They scurred.

>>20225874

>Watcha think?

Hard to tell. Need the actual video, to see if we can examine the ground a bit more and do a comparison. Where's our local "Greek Jew Hater" (tm) the Jannies all hate, when we need him?

>>20225885

Thanks, Anon. Was just asking for this. Lemme grab the video and I'll scrub it through Premiere.

Godspeed!

o7

>>20225918

>What is this an investigation into?

You tell me. But when I find illegal tunnels in a city, allegedly done by "Chabad Teens" from one source, "Mexican illegals" by another and they found what appears to be multiple mattresses, one of which appeared to be soiled by something, a book that may or may not have blood on it, a child's high chair, what appears to be bloody rags on a table and various articles of clothing, as well as foreign nationals hiding in the tunnels, well, my gut tells me I kinda want to start asking questions and it has nothing at all to do with their being "Jewish." I'd start asking questions no matter the alleged "ethnicity" or "religious beliefs" of the actors.

>>20225955

>with Vanilla Ice.

>talk about cringe.

Kek. I had the same feeling. I loathed him in the 90s and his fake persona. He's tolerable now, with his metal stuff.

>>20226003

>And no one has to answer your questions, officer.

I'm not a cop anymore. Check your privilege there. I'm merely stating that this incident merits investigation. In the past couple of days, all of the pushback appears to be solely the fact that these people are Jewish and the Chabad HQ. However, all my points that merit investigation have nothing to do with their being Jewish. It has to do with possible crimes.

>So how are you investigating if you have no one answering your questions?

That's not how investigations work, "Anon," but don't worry, I can tell you're BIG MAD for my even asking questions.

>And where are you getting the authority to confiscate what you claim is "bloodied?"

That my friend is called "probable cause." You learn that your first year. It's the basis of all investigations. Those rags could be soiled from rust water. Could also be from a industrial lubricant. They have a tendency to stain the same. That's why you'd want to make sure to do a chemical test on the fabric, to make sure there's no DNA.

Quid pro quo:

Why do you have a problem with asking questions?

>>20225967

>instability is a real issue because the IRT subway line runs down Eastern Parkway.

Indeed. And these tunnels were dug, illegally, without the knowledge or proper permits from the city of New York. That, in itself, is a crime, but we're not allowed to talk about this at all, apparently, 'cos it happened in a Jewish temple. I could give two shits about that. Why was it done? Why were there apparently foreign nationals in the tunnels? Why did they find mattresses? Why was one of them soiled? Why was there a child's high chair? Why was there a big mound of dirt? Why were they attempting to dig to an (allegedly) empty building? Why does one of the tunnels (allegedly) go to a children's museum? Why were there soiled fabrics in the tunnels? Why did they have what appeared to be a red-stained book in there?

These are all valid and legitimate questions, but it can't be notable. It can't be looked into. It can't beresearched. All muh "Shills" (tm) here are implying without actually saying that the only reason we're even asking about this, is the simple fact that the people involved were Jewish. I don't give a fuck who they are. There's a lot of heinous and illegal activity going on with this incident. It needs to be looked into.

>>20226057

o7

I'm not understanding why this subject verbum non grata. Especially here.

>>20226047

It said this. Dart appeared to feel that my even asking deserved to nuke all my poasts in the bread. There's a reason I keep two tabs open on QR. I've been watching our BO and BVs for a while now.

>>20226147

Oh, Dart. I don't care that my stuff was or was not deleted. All it does is prove that we can't ask about the tunnels, 'cos the people that did it were Jewish. Occam's razor. It will be me and mine tying the nooses and making themtightwhen the time comes. I draw the line with hurting children. Don't give a shit who you are.

>>20226111

It appears to be the Owner and his/her/it/they/them cohorts. One thing is quite clear, they donotwant us talking about those tunnels and the sole purpose for that appears to be the simple fact that the people responsible were Jewish.

As my TO told me when I was a Boot, "Logic dictates."

>>20226192

Kek

>>20226211

Who said anything about "free speech," Faggot? I was talking about possible criminal activity. Why would you ban the research on possible criminal activity? Isn't that why we're here to stop child trafficking and end muh "Cabal" (tm)?

>>20226208

Yeah, theyreallywant to make this about "the Jews" when it isn't. I don't care if they're Jewish or not. If they were hurting kids, they need to be punished.

>>20226243

>You concluded they were hurting kids?

Yeah, that's not how it works, but I digress. I'm tired of trying to explain to people how criminal investigations are conducted. There is for sure criminal activity here, by the mere fact these are illegal tunnels. The mattresses, the high chair and many other things suggest there may even be more criminal activity, which is what is called "reasonable suspicion." Probable cause was already established by finding illegal tunnels.

>The judge would throw your whole case out even if you dug up bodies.

The Prosecutor wouldn't even bring the case to a judge, if they didn't have substantial evidence to conclude that a crime was committed, Moran. That's why they do investigations.