Anonymous ID: a06362 Jan. 12, 2024, 11:58 a.m. No.20232602   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2614

>>20232568

>Is it stealing if I announce I am stealing it.

Not at all. It was made for distribution. I hereby release it under Royalty Free, Creative Commons and GNU GPL licenses all at once, so you can pilpul your way out, if anyone kvetches about it.

Anonymous ID: a06362 Jan. 12, 2024, 1:08 p.m. No.20232890   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2904

>>20232717

>the false flag.

"The false flag," Anon? Aren't you (filling) "in the gaps with the narrative (you) want? I'm curious as to why your definition on the tunnels under the Chabad HQ is "false flag?" For someone who claims to be, quoth you, "waiting until the details are released," you appear to have already made your decision on the matter.

Anonymous ID: a06362 Jan. 12, 2024, 1:22 p.m. No.20232944   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>20232904

>Yes, I offered a theory and where I stand in relation to that theory.

And I simply asked for said theory. One, I apparently have to ask for again. Why do you define this incident as a "false flag?"

>Still waiting until the details are released before I can say for sure.

And what "details" exactly are you waiting for?

>That was pretty clearly stated in my reply the first time.

Not really. Your opening statement was "Or maybe he's playing along with the false flag." You set the narrative from the get-go, then come back with, verbatim in toto "I'm always open to be proven wrong though, so I'm waiting until the details are released than listening to paid posters fill in the gaps with the narrative they want." I think what's "pretty clearly stated" is that you say it's a false flag and no amount of "details" will change that "theory." Otherwise, you wouldn't have started off with said "theory."

 

Would you care to share how you came up with the theory that the tunnel incident is a "false flag?"

Anonymous ID: a06362 Jan. 12, 2024, 1:27 p.m. No.20232962   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>20232946

>Her dad was probably more interested in getting Ivanka in business school, than in getting her into modeling.

It's a slide, Anon. The whole "Christian Patriarch" (tm) thing. As the "Male Head" of the family, ergo Trump had final say, yadda yadda. Obviously he knew he was liking her to pedos, yadda yadda. It only proves Trump is also a pedo, yadda yadda. Ivana was the model. Trump had all the contacts, but if they can project it on him and you believe itโ€ฆ.

 

Always the same playbook.