>>2021321 (from prev)

Thanks anon it did for me.

Baker if you did not see this at the end of #2549 here you go.

Baker

If it helps

>>2021248 rt >>2019981 —- Do 'reflections' violate NAT SEC rules?

>>2021248 rt >>2019832 —- Do 'reflections' violate NAT SEC rules?

>>2021248 rt >>2020544 —- Do 'reflections' violate NAT SEC rules?

>>2024269

I love winning! even if it takes about 17 years…. how about that!

>>2024285

Great, glad to help. Thank you too!

>>2024318

I agree on that, and look at the gate and tilt of the shoulders too… also… who else do you see in the photo… people standing around … maybe they are watching? And you hear stories about people who have security ditching their security…it's a possibility to consider at least