Wow, you sound really tough. You really mean what you're saying. You sure showed them.
>I'm almost certain this is not a Q Proof. A Q Proof at THIS stage would have to be FAR more clear and convincing. Besides, on June 15th, he said:
>Marine One proofs forthcoming.
>AF1 (inside) thereafter.
>WE HAVE NOT YET SEEN MARINE ONE PROOFS! This means the AF1 (inside) proofs are not yet "next in line" to be seen… we have to see the Marine One proofs FIRST before he will do the AF1 proofs.
>Ergo: This is not a proof at all, but a message!
You're putting trust in Q doing exactly what he says he 's going to do. For your theory to work, Q has to have had followed through on every single thing he's said thus far.
KEK
Notable.