Anonymous ID: 99aae8 July 3, 2018, 11:10 p.m. No.2024559   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4605 >>4633 >>5063 >>5255

>>2021248

>Do 'reflections' violate NAT SEC rules?

WAIT A MINUTE

When Q is asking us ~how do you legally introduce evidence? He's also referring to F_I Memos that started getting used as "evidence".

Doesn't that give you a chance, as you are composing your notes, UPON REFLECTION, introduce thoughts or facts that you have unrelatedly gathered, into the Memo (evidence).

That's how you ILLEGALLY introduce evidenceโ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: 99aae8 July 3, 2018, 11:30 p.m. No.2024764   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2024690

>>2024528

Breads are moving fastโ€ฆ so has nobody noted that if you imagine you are not looking at a bald person, but rather the light color at the crown of the head is due to "sheen" i.e., light hitting hair highlights.

Now look at the brow.

IT IS POTUS!!!

Anonymous ID: 99aae8 July 4, 2018, 12:08 a.m. No.2025073   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2024525

Completely obvious what is being signaled here. I'm going to say it delicately out or respect to the subjects. The woman's hands are formed to represent the female anatomy. He is grabbing that anatomy. Taunting them. Just otherworldly trolling.