>>2021248 (Qpb)
This is a very interesting drop because if Q were a LARP, he's proven to be a very good one and this would just be lazy even for the LARP.
Intradesting phrasing here…
>Who would have thought the 'Twitter' phone could be so useful.
>Do 'reflections' violate NAT SEC rules?
We would imagine they would because I don't think you take a photo of the reflection of the Nuke codes that you could give those away.
>Where must one be located in order to obtain a reflection on the back of a phone of that image?
Obtain a reflection on the back of a phone of that IMAGE. Didn't say a reflection of the lamp, of that location or anything else to necessitate the interpretation that it is live. Q said "image".
>Image provided here has been distorted (stretched).
>Q
So what would be the significance of Q holding a stock photo and catching a reflection. Something AF1>AAPL related?
The skepticism is real, it is healthy, but shills are running to this being proof of LARP.