You need to work on your reading comprehension.
No not deflection, you need to work on your reading comprehension. You either completely misunderstood what I said or don't care for the sake of your narrative.
They're all domestic enemies to the Constitution of the United States and We the People it represents.
No, it's not deflection. You didn't ask me anything, you're confusing me with another anon. I simply replied to
>Did Q also say it was a literal reference? Nope.
>Never occurred to you that he might hare been speaking in metaphors, did it?
>Take the Jesus shit out of the equation, please.
with >>20246255.
You didn't notice I was a different anon and didn't even understand what I said.
So again, I DID NOT deflect, you're just incredibly stupid.
Now who's deflecting. Many anons are on this board, and many can and do reply. None need specify they're not the other anon.
When you don't notice another anon ID with multiple posts BEFORE the post you claim they IP jumped from, it's on you.
You just showed AGAIN how incredibly stupid you are.
You just keep doubling down on the stupidity kek.
>No, but typically they do.
No, they do not typically do that. Lurk moar.
>Right. 'Cos you could have been phonefagging and not received the original (you). It's happened to me as well.
You can imagine whatever bullshit scenario you want, it's false and you trying to deflect from your own stupidity.
>Kek. I'm not the one that started (OUR) conversation with ad hominem attacks
Really? Here is my first comment to you, please point out the attack. >>20246255 LB
Here is your first reply to me >>20246591
Do you want to keep doubling down on your stupidity?
That's me in the last bread. Jesus Christ are you new here? You have no idea how this place works. IDs change every bread.
Let me spell it out for you. >>20246255 was ME in the last bread, and that was my FIRST post to you. I DID NOT make an ad-hominem attack.
You thought I was another anon and accuse me of being in a cult, when you didn't understand what I said.
You're entirely too stupid to keep going with, you can't grasp even basics here.
You are literally too stupid to be here.
Last time, then you're filtered. You never asked me a question. You're STILL confusing me for another anon because you can't accept you're wrong. LURK MOAR! Learn how things work here.
You replied to another anon last bread, that anons ID was b31f16. That anon is not me. You did not ask me anything. My ID lasst bread was 981897. Post >>20246255 LB was my first post TO YOU, but not my first post last bread.
You replied to me in this new bread here >>20246591 LB. I still get the (You) [see pic[ even though my ID is different this bread because IDs change every bread…That was your first reply to me, and you didn't understand what I said, thought I was another anon, and accuse me of being in a cult.
I responded here >>20246633 telling you that you need to work on your reading comprehension, and now have the ID 1e0682 because, again, ID's CHANGE EVERY BREAD.
You replied here >>20246647 accusing me of deflecting
My ID last bread was 981897, my ID this bread is 1e0682. That's not a jump, that's how 8kun works.
Now, you're filtered.
Did you feel the same when Canadian truckers blocked the road, or is your support of violently removing protestors blocking a road view-point specific?
So it all depends on if you agree with the viewpoint of the protestors. Blocking roads to protest what you agree with is fine, blocking roads to protest what you don't agree with is unacceptable.
Not at all, just pointing out hypocrisy.
You see many people claim to love freedom but they don't, they love a dictatorship/tyranny that likes and dislikes the same things they do. If they agree with it/like it, everyone should be free to do it. If they don't agree with/like it, people should be punished.
Divide and Rule is working well on many here.
I'm not saying blocking the road is wrong or right, just pointing out to many it depends on what they're protesting, as in it's based on content.