Anonymous ID: 5f3f99 Jan. 18, 2024, 6:49 a.m. No.20262416   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Mike Davis 

@mrddmia

 

Legal Check: True.

 

Members of Congress have civil and criminal immunity for official acts—including “outer perimeter.”

 

So do federal judges.

 

Why wouldn’t President?

 

(Other than Trump Derangement Syndrome.)

 

Can Trump 47 DOJ prosecute Obama for capital murder for drone striking 2 Americans, including 16-year old?

 

Or Biden for manslaughter for fentanyl and other deaths resulting from his refusal to secure border?

 

Jan 18, 2024, 9:35 AM

https://truthsocial.com/@mrddmia/posts/111777451379706905

 

 

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

7h

A PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES MUST HAVE FULL IMMUNITY, WITHOUT WHICH IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM/HER TO PROPERLY FUNCTION. ANY MISTAKE, EVEN IF WELL INTENDED, WOULD BE MET WITH ALMOST CERTAIN INDICTMENT BY THE OPPOSING PARTY AT TERM END. EVEN EVENTS THAT “CROSS THE LINE” MUST FALL UNDER TOTAL IMMUNITY, OR IT WILL BE YEARS OF TRAUMA TRYING TO DETERMINE GOOD FROM BAD. THERE MUST BE CERTAINTY. EXAMPLE: YOU CAN’T STOP POLICE FROM DOING THE JOB OF STRONG & EFFECTIVE CRIME PREVENTION BECAUSE YOU WANT TO GUARD AGAINST THE OCCASIONAL “ROGUE COP” OR “BAD APPLE.” SOMETIMES YOU JUST HAVE TO LIVE WITH “GREAT BUT SLIGHTLY IMPERFECT.” ALL PRESIDENTS MUST HAVE COMPLETE & TOTAL PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY, OR THE AUTHORITY & DECISIVENESS OF A PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WILL BE STRIPPED & GONE FOREVER. HOPEFULLY THIS WILL BE AN EASY DECISION. GOD BLESS THE SUPREME COURT!

 

 

BillKaetz

@BillKaetz

Replying to @mrddmia and @realDonaldTrump

That's not all true, Federal Judges are covered under immunity for "Judicial Acts" only - Not legislative acts, Not administrative acts. It's the "Act", not the person or office title held. The question is whether Trump "acted" presidential or not, I believe he did, immunity should apply.

Jan 18, 2024, 9:42 AM

Anonymous ID: 5f3f99 Jan. 18, 2024, 6:50 a.m. No.20262417   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Mike Davis 

@mrddmia

 

Legal Check: True.

 

Members of Congress have civil and criminal immunity for official acts—including “outer perimeter.”

 

So do federal judges.

 

Why wouldn’t President?

 

(Other than Trump Derangement Syndrome.)

 

Can Trump 47 DOJ prosecute Obama for capital murder for drone striking 2 Americans, including 16-year old?

 

Or Biden for manslaughter for fentanyl and other deaths resulting from his refusal to secure border?

 

Jan 18, 2024, 9:35 AM

https://truthsocial.com/@mrddmia/posts/111777451379706905

 

 

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

7h

A PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES MUST HAVE FULL IMMUNITY, WITHOUT WHICH IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM/HER TO PROPERLY FUNCTION. ANY MISTAKE, EVEN IF WELL INTENDED, WOULD BE MET WITH ALMOST CERTAIN INDICTMENT BY THE OPPOSING PARTY AT TERM END. EVEN EVENTS THAT “CROSS THE LINE” MUST FALL UNDER TOTAL IMMUNITY, OR IT WILL BE YEARS OF TRAUMA TRYING TO DETERMINE GOOD FROM BAD. THERE MUST BE CERTAINTY. EXAMPLE: YOU CAN’T STOP POLICE FROM DOING THE JOB OF STRONG & EFFECTIVE CRIME PREVENTION BECAUSE YOU WANT TO GUARD AGAINST THE OCCASIONAL “ROGUE COP” OR “BAD APPLE.” SOMETIMES YOU JUST HAVE TO LIVE WITH “GREAT BUT SLIGHTLY IMPERFECT.” ALL PRESIDENTS MUST HAVE COMPLETE & TOTAL PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY, OR THE AUTHORITY & DECISIVENESS OF A PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WILL BE STRIPPED & GONE FOREVER. HOPEFULLY THIS WILL BE AN EASY DECISION. GOD BLESS THE SUPREME COURT!

 

 

BillKaetz

@BillKaetz

Replying to @mrddmia and @realDonaldTrump

That's not all true, Federal Judges are covered under immunity for "Judicial Acts" only - Not legislative acts, Not administrative acts. It's the "Act", not the person or office title held. The question is whether Trump "acted" presidential or not, I believe he did, immunity should apply.

Jan 18, 2024, 9:42 AM>>20262396

Anonymous ID: 5f3f99 Jan. 18, 2024, 6:50 a.m. No.20262418   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Mike Davis 

@mrddmia

 

Legal Check: True.

 

Members of Congress have civil and criminal immunity for official acts—including “outer perimeter.”

 

So do federal judges.

 

Why wouldn’t President?

 

(Other than Trump Derangement Syndrome.)

 

Can Trump 47 DOJ prosecute Obama for capital murder for drone striking 2 Americans, including 16-year old?

 

Or Biden for manslaughter for fentanyl and other deaths resulting from his refusal to secure border?

 

Jan 18, 2024, 9:35 AM

https://truthsocial.com/@mrddmia/posts/111777451379706905

 

 

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

7h

A PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES MUST HAVE FULL IMMUNITY, WITHOUT WHICH IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM/HER TO PROPERLY FUNCTION. ANY MISTAKE, EVEN IF WELL INTENDED, WOULD BE MET WITH ALMOST CERTAIN INDICTMENT BY THE OPPOSING PARTY AT TERM END. EVEN EVENTS THAT “CROSS THE LINE” MUST FALL UNDER TOTAL IMMUNITY, OR IT WILL BE YEARS OF TRAUMA TRYING TO DETERMINE GOOD FROM BAD. THERE MUST BE CERTAINTY. EXAMPLE: YOU CAN’T STOP POLICE FROM DOING THE JOB OF STRONG & EFFECTIVE CRIME PREVENTION BECAUSE YOU WANT TO GUARD AGAINST THE OCCASIONAL “ROGUE COP” OR “BAD APPLE.” SOMETIMES YOU JUST HAVE TO LIVE WITH “GREAT BUT SLIGHTLY IMPERFECT.” ALL PRESIDENTS MUST HAVE COMPLETE & TOTAL PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY, OR THE AUTHORITY & DECISIVENESS OF A PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WILL BE STRIPPED & GONE FOREVER. HOPEFULLY THIS WILL BE AN EASY DECISION. GOD BLESS THE SUPREME COURT!

 

 

BillKaetz

@BillKaetz

Replying to @mrddmia and @realDonaldTrump

That's not all true, Federal Judges are covered under immunity for "Judicial Acts" only - Not legislative acts, Not administrative acts. It's the "Act", not the person or office title held. The question is whether Trump "acted" presidential or not, I believe he did, immunity should apply.

Jan 18, 2024, 9:42 AM>>20262396

Anonymous ID: 5f3f99 Jan. 18, 2024, 6:57 a.m. No.20262432   🗄️.is 🔗kun

WATCH LIVE: House Homeland Security Committee Holds Second Impeachment Hearing Against Alejandro Mayorkas at 9:30 AM ET

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsod6sbSHSA

 

 

The House Committee on Homeland Security’s second impeachment hearing against Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas is set to kick off at 9:30 am ET.

 

The Gateway Pundit reported on the first Mayorkas impeachment hearing, which featured testimony from Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen, Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey, and Frank O. Bowman III, professor emeritus of law, University of Missouri School of Law. Missouri AG Andrew Bailey told The Gateway Pundit after the hearing that the invasion of our border is “an intentional behavior on the part of the Secretary to undermine the rule of law by perverting the plain text of the law, to fling the doors wide open, and allow in who would otherwise be illegal criminal aliens.”

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/watch-live-house-homeland-security-committee-holds-second