I have to disagree. Some of them are facts. Some of them are notable but are the best scientific method guesswork we can do, but aren't established facts. some of them are opines but are notable.
We have to cover all bases of noteworthy callouts. Not all notables are facts.
BUT we could consider tagging the ones we can 100% establish as fact, and tag it a forensic fact. in red text, like we do notables.
All facts are notable, not all notables are facts. Forensic facts is a subset.
But I like the direction.