Why did Q post all of those pen pics from the WH without this reflection explanation? Would they also not be "NAT SEC" rule violations?
Go back to Jan 20 and the posting / deleting of the fake Podesta email.
Or the provably doctored National Front flag (altered to look like an Antifa flag) that was posted on April 25 as proof that Antifa are Nazis.
Then we had a Tracy Beanz march endorsement.
Then we had Q tee shirts.
Then blurry ear photos.
Now this doctored AF1 stock photo.
Yeah, WTF?
Q posted plenty of insider photos not using this reflection trick. Did he violate "NAT SEC" rules then, or nah?
First red flag for me was the hyper-defensive Q post in Dec/Jan saying if you want arrest now you shouldn't be here in the discussion. When you are promising military tribunals and arrests back in October people kinda expected follow through. The very first Q post promised these things, so when the curious start investigating, it looks super sketchy from the very first post. Yeah, I know he was referring to SA events, but then you're in flowchart conspiracy land to explain away obvious holes. Lots of promises, lots of misses, and look at this very thread full of complete retards chasing down a blurry photo of some rando in Hong Kong that cannot possibly be resolved or answered.
>Do not glorify us
That is the only thing that happens here and it's hard to watch.
I'm still here, still following, still contributing though less so after the new year and the invasion of the normies. It's a conundrum because there is obviously choice morsels but then obvious garbage, just shit-tier garbage thrown in and the insane crowd here will go to any length to justify. That bugs me too. This is not anon-level analysis going on, just angry blind faith. Time will tell. The thing is, POTUS is doing fine, and people like Fitton at Judicial Watch do more to advance justice and expose wrongdoing than this board. Time will tell.