no problem. I was workfagging when that picture dropped.
the fact that people can precisely reproduce Q's photo using their own in-home setup pretty much seals the deal for me on how Q took the photo.
We can see from the pixelations visible in the "blue tinted" images that you are not using the same source image for comparison.
rando anons reproduced Q's photo using their own in=-home setups. That's where your blue-tint images come from.
read the notables, though honestly they have not been very well formatted the past 24 hours.
Because the anon will be able to hold their phone at the exact angle and distance to the screen as Q did.
So of course the angling is different in RandoAnon's reproduction than it is from Q's.
yep been addressed that these two photos are within a few blocks of each other.
still not sure if they are from the same time.
read notables newfag
Can anyone validly explain why this pic is not proof that Q took a photo of a photo reflecting in his phone back…
spacing of the Curtains align perfectly.
There is an animated GIF version of this as well, but I can't find it right now.
Q did respond..he doubled and then tripled down on it..said he was trolling, but didn't say who
He also dropped some SEEMINGLY important lines about "are reflections violations of Nat Sec?"
and "who knew the Twitter phone would be so useful"
THOSE ARE THE THINGS we should be trying to figure out
2013 earliest due to cars present.
Jan 2016 at latest due to HK government documents that list the kindergarten at that address at that time period.
Sometime between 2011 and 2017 all of the the signs had disappeared from over the road and the kindergarten moved to its current location.
I have been present for this entire process since Q posted the pic. The images contained in that collage are from various sources, and only spuriously related.
The hand drawn diagram is VERY inaccurate, to say the least.
I'm not sure. Q didn't specify if he thought reflections violate nat sec.
It's possible he was implying other people had done that for classified info as a way to leak them?
Maybe he has such phones from confiscated from clowns with such photos on them.
"insider photos" are not the same as nat sec.
How does Q make his photos?
I came into this after noticing the weird dimensions of Q's photo posts..
591 x 1280..if you google for those dimensions you almost exclusively come up with 4/8chan forum posts..many of which are Q
and some other russian gun forums..
See pic related. Clearly Q is using an iPhone X and screenshotting, reducing 52.5% (bizarrely precise, but correct nonetheless), and then manually removing the 'home bar' in post edit?
Is there some app that would do this automatically?
GLOWING NICELY FOR BROCK
It proves nothing about whether Q is a larp or not.
It just proves how the photo was taken.
You are jumping to conclusions that dont exist yet.
Begone divisor!