>>2027496 lb
>https://www.justice.gov/usam/usam-9-27000-principles-federal-prosecution#9-27.240
That statute is based on the principle that another jurisdiction can prosecute him for crimes committed in that district. It does not say any district in this country can prosecute him for crimes committed outside the district.
>>2027572 lb
EXACTLY!
>>2027580 lb
since when did cyber crimes become violent????
>>2027589 lb
Can you please link it?
what do you want us to do? GO around and start killing anyone we think is a pedo?
Well aren't you just the clever one, putting words in my mouth and all. Projection much???
Anon, let's wait and see if he goes before a tribunal.
no man, we are so NOT! We abide by laws and don't condone violence on this board. You're in the wrong place.
I read it the same way.
You're right, we may never know. But I am holding out hope that his plea deal can be overturned by a military tribunal. His crimes are so significant that a tribunal is the proper place for him to be tried. I want to trust that Q feels as strongly about reason and espionage as we do.
treason
NO
I have expanded my thinking and I am very open minded. And I DO get it. If you want to be happy they left open a way for him to be charged with destruction of federal property vs the greater offenses of espionage and the like, well, good for you. Huber has shit because the DA exonerated him for ALL non violent crimes. WHY????? He was only charged with bank fraud. Why give him blanket protection? Makes no sense.
You're wrong. Read about Venue for prosecuting crimes.
ONLY if he committed crimes in another district, can the venue be moved to that district under 3 conditions.
I don't believe so. He lived and worked in the DC area.
Has he been charged with any of those crimes? How much prison time will he get for money laundering vs espionage?
Yes I do. Why I have spent the morning debunking false hopes. The only hope left is a tribunal is stronger than a Superior Court.
Ever think that was meant for someone else besides anons?