Anonymous ID: 066c1a July 4, 2018, 9:34 a.m. No.2028894   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2028808

How many pen photos were posted without the alleged "reflection" trick anyway? At least four pen photos from inside the WH? These don't violate "NAT SEC" but AF1 photos do? A reflected image makes it not in violation? Stop insulting us. It makes no sense. Compounding this is the link to the fake Bilderberg video and the yournewswire link. It's all garbage and real anons know this. These are just facts. As to why, I have no idea. But the facts remain.

Anonymous ID: 066c1a July 4, 2018, 9:38 a.m. No.2028949   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2028920

See, this is why this project is going nowhere. The mental gymnastics required to keep believing are incredible. Try explaining this to a normie with a straight face. You'd rightly be called a moron. This is your proof?