Anonymous ID: 9ab5a3 July 4, 2018, 9:28 a.m. No.2028823   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8873

>>2028672

 

What iirks me most about the photo is that its such an obvious fake. The amount of digging, photoexamination. Its a lowball, like seriously low ball. Almost too bad.

 

Are we sure Q isn't trying to tell us something about it?

 

Its a photo from an article, reflected on a Iphone backside.

 

Followed by "Do reflections violate rules?". Future proves past, imho stay frosty on this. remember the words instead of the picture. I think he's trying to tell us something.

Anonymous ID: 9ab5a3 July 4, 2018, 9:36 a.m. No.2028919   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2028873

>one way to look at it is that reflection could refer to information gained without intention and/or personal choice, i.o.w. is there someone in possession of NSI that under this protocol could reveal it?

 

Exactly.

 

Something is off. Why drop such a obvious fake, If Q was fake he would know better than attempt something like that. If it isn't whats going on right now. Something REALLY fake is coming. Or maybe "intel" through "mirror" that threatens Nat sec?