Anonymous ID: bee4d3 July 4, 2018, 11:18 a.m. No.2030404   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0455 >>0479

>>2029996

LEARN STEGONOGRAPHY U EEJITS

 

Q ADMITTED TO PHOTOSHOPPING THE PIC WAKE THE FUCK UP ITS WHY NOT WHAT

 

WHY DID HE POST THE PIC AND THE WORDS TO GO WITH IT?

 

WHHHHYYYYYYY? FIGURE IT OUT AND STOP SHITTING UP THE BREAD

Anonymous ID: bee4d3 July 4, 2018, 11:21 a.m. No.2030423   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0465 >>0472

>>2030302

Apple is under fire for moving iCloud data to China - CNN Money

money.cnn.com/2018/02/28/technology/apple-icloud-data-china/index.html

Feb 28, 2018 - Apple is moving iCloud accounts registered in China to state-run Chinese

Anonymous ID: bee4d3 July 4, 2018, 11:24 a.m. No.2030465   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0485

>>2030302

>>2030423

>>2030444

The CLOUD Act amends the SCA, expressly requiring email service providers to preserve, back up, and disclose to U.S. law enforcement electronic data responsive to a warrant issued under the SCA within their “possession, custody, or control,” even when that data is located outside the United States.

Anonymous ID: bee4d3 July 4, 2018, 11:25 a.m. No.2030485   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0493

>>2030465

While providing law enforcement the ability to compel a service provider under the SCA to produce electronic data stored outside the United States, the CLOUD Act also imposes some limitations, permitting service providers to challenge warrants or other legal process issued under the SCA in certain circumstances. For example, a service provider may seek to modify or quash a warrant or other legal process issued under the SCA on the basis of a conflict of law with a “qualifying foreign government,” which is defined as a government with which the U.S. executive branch has entered into an executive agreement under the CLOUD Act.

Anonymous ID: bee4d3 July 4, 2018, 11:26 a.m. No.2030493   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2030485

To successfully challenge such a warrant, a service provider must demonstrate that: (1) the customer or subscriber is not a “United States person,” as defined, and does not reside in the United States; and (2) the required disclosure would create a material risk that the provider would violate the laws of the qualifying foreign government.

 

 

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

yoohoo